1.5 sec in total
216 ms
1.2 sec
136 ms
Click here to check amazing John Loomis content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about johnloomis.org
Visit johnloomis.orgWe analyzed Johnloomis.org page load time and found that the first response time was 216 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.
johnloomis.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.9 s
88/100
10%
Value1.9 s
98/100
25%
Value1.9 s
100/100
10%
Value1,000 ms
28/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value5.8 s
67/100
10%
216 ms
32 ms
83 ms
170 ms
12 ms
Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Johnloomis.org, 53% (28 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 13% (7 requests) were made to Apis.google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (395 ms) relates to the external source Static.xx.fbcdn.net.
Page size can be reduced by 9.9 kB (13%)
74.8 kB
64.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Johnloomis.org main page is 74.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 40.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 3.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 3.4 kB or 61% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. John Loomis images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 4.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 4.7 kB or 16% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (61%)
51
20
The browser has sent 51 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of John Loomis. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
johnloomis.org
216 ms
analytics.js
32 ms
plusone.js
83 ms
loomis.jpg
170 ms
collect
12 ms
likebox.php
303 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
23 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
51 ms
fastbutton
133 ms
postmessageRelay
34 ms
like.php
152 ms
api.js
64 ms
core:rpc:shindig.random:shindig.sha1.js
76 ms
2536007149-postmessagerelay.js
66 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
25 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
25 ms
W5F8_SL0XFawnjxHGsZjJA.ttf
86 ms
TD3k6ckEuVD.css
165 ms
Ad-mJyRG8CK.css
201 ms
AdP_CKHZFBh.css
215 ms
_rx8naC75Dy.js
302 ms
TuuohdynnB6.js
231 ms
d6RcVOf4_V3.js
320 ms
phKJLmGTCBO.js
334 ms
roNeOY-tz5Y.css
177 ms
UHhaxo8Cs3k.css
190 ms
dbNRhrdsQao.css
210 ms
1ssvpqNRk1L.css
298 ms
O8DK6hTywHD.css
327 ms
x5F9OMjKyLw.js
354 ms
ICDbTSzjQEg.js
349 ms
TTCre3391I0.js
350 ms
njO1TPvGzoR.js
352 ms
b_6HNn_J2BZ.js
350 ms
7cm7D75Y0Sf.js
374 ms
rFmE1g6Dkoz.js
395 ms
336JejShbZp.js
372 ms
Bw8qRoQ9D-v.js
60 ms
Xz08Qlfw8qz.js
176 ms
62728_104131446317168_6948614_n.jpg
122 ms
safe_image.php
120 ms
11230974_991892064196292_8311354056148484613_n.jpg
106 ms
735175_737292479749151_6355107111924699032_n.jpg
102 ms
12717905_1011592838912937_908774704847091593_n.jpg
102 ms
11426240_10204346905019023_8152897030018284178_n.jpg
102 ms
12644908_775441059227095_3757302570142554770_n.jpg
103 ms
11145230_1589252058015394_6449047012812903153_n.jpg
102 ms
wL6VQj7Ab77.png
97 ms
s7jcwEQH7Sx.png
96 ms
QDwYpIaRyfG.png
97 ms
a-ZN6WoEOje.png
96 ms
I6-MnjEovm5.js
39 ms
vlXaquuXMrr.js
42 ms
johnloomis.org accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
johnloomis.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
johnloomis.org SEO score
EN
N/A
N/A
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Johnloomis.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Johnloomis.org main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
johnloomis.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of John Loomis. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: