Tools & Wizards About Us
johnwhiteconstructionco.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 20

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    37% of other websites

  • 90

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 75% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 99

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    93% of websites

johnwhiteconstructionco.com

General Contractor in Syracuse, NY | John White Construction Co

Page Load Speed

1.4 sec in total

First Response

214 ms

Resources Loaded

852 ms

Page Rendered

357 ms

johnwhiteconstructionco.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to johnwhiteconstructionco.com homepage info - get ready to check John White Construction Co best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about johnwhiteconstructionco.com

In need of a general contractor for your home? John White Construction Co in Syracuse, NY, offers remodeling services for any project, big or small. Call us!

Visit johnwhiteconstructionco.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Johnwhiteconstructionco.com page load time and found that the first response time was 214 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster. This domain responded with an error, which can significantly jeopardize Johnwhiteconstructionco.com rating and web reputation

Performance Metrics

johnwhiteconstructionco.com performance score

20

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

41/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.4 s

8/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value7,880 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.048

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value16.5 s

5/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

johnwhiteconstructionco.com

214 ms

analytics.js

25 ms

sg.css

96 ms

s.css

215 ms

css

54 ms

Our browser made a total of 43 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 7% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Johnwhiteconstructionco.com, 81% (35 requests) were made to U.b5z.net and 5% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (546 ms) relates to the external source U.b5z.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 177.6 kB (19%)

Content Size

955.6 kB

After Optimization

778.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Johnwhiteconstructionco.com main page is 955.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 845.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 18.9 kB

  • Original 24.7 kB
  • After minification 24.4 kB
  • After compression 5.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 18.9 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 102.7 kB

  • Original 845.3 kB
  • After minification 742.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, John White Construction Co needs image optimization as it can save up to 102.7 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-61%

Potential reduce by 38.2 kB

  • Original 62.6 kB
  • After minification 62.6 kB
  • After compression 24.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 38.2 kB or 61% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 17.9 kB

  • Original 23.0 kB
  • After minification 20.5 kB
  • After compression 5.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Johnwhiteconstructionco.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 17.9 kB or 78% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (43%)

Requests Now

40

After Optimization

23

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 40 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of John White Construction Co. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

johnwhiteconstructionco.com

johnwhiteconstructionco.com

214 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

25 ms

sg.css

sg.css

96 ms

s.css

s.css

215 ms

css

css

54 ms

core.js

core.js

96 ms

menupopupcss.js

menupopupcss.js

96 ms

sm.css

sm.css

128 ms

collect

collect

24 ms

bkgrnd.jpg

bkgrnd.jpg

143 ms

badge36_36.png

badge36_36.png

137 ms

rnddot.gif

rnddot.gif

92 ms

qb73.gif

qb73.gif

109 ms

qb74.gif

qb74.gif

108 ms

tw_32x32.png

tw_32x32.png

88 ms

fb_32x32.png

fb_32x32.png

100 ms

pi_32x32.png

pi_32x32.png

134 ms

johnwhitebanner980.jpg

johnwhitebanner980.jpg

397 ms

johnwhitemainpageimage4.jpg

johnwhitemainpageimage4.jpg

483 ms

johnwhitemainpageinset2.jpg

johnwhitemainpageinset2.jpg

390 ms

johnwhitesidebarchoose.jpg

johnwhitesidebarchoose.jpg

279 ms

johnwhitesidebarkitchen.jpg

johnwhitesidebarkitchen.jpg

327 ms

johnwhitesidebarbath.jpg

johnwhitesidebarbath.jpg

335 ms

johnwhitesidebarcarpentry.jpg

johnwhitesidebarcarpentry.jpg

381 ms

johnwhitesidebarremodeling.jpg

johnwhitesidebarremodeling.jpg

416 ms

johnwhitesidebarwindows.jpg

johnwhitesidebarwindows.jpg

426 ms

johnwhitesidebarhandyman.jpg

johnwhitesidebarhandyman.jpg

488 ms

johnwhitesidebarestimate.jpg

johnwhitesidebarestimate.jpg

494 ms

johnwhitesidebarreviews.jpg

johnwhitesidebarreviews.jpg

503 ms

johnwhitesidebargallery.jpg

johnwhitesidebargallery.jpg

511 ms

imgres.jpg

imgres.jpg

484 ms

rnddot.gif

rnddot.gif

523 ms

houzz.png

houzz.png

543 ms

tw_20x20.png

tw_20x20.png

531 ms

fb_20x20.png

fb_20x20.png

537 ms

pi_20x20.png

pi_20x20.png

546 ms

badge36_36.png

badge36_36.png

134 ms

i8.png

i8.png

401 ms

nav-arr1.png

nav-arr1.png

401 ms

i9.png

i9.png

411 ms

i5.png

i5.png

415 ms

i6.png

i6.png

420 ms

i7.png

i7.png

423 ms

Accessibility Review

johnwhiteconstructionco.com accessibility score

90

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

johnwhiteconstructionco.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

johnwhiteconstructionco.com SEO score

99

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Johnwhiteconstructionco.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Johnwhiteconstructionco.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

johnwhiteconstructionco.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of John White Construction Co. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: