5.8 sec in total
1.2 sec
4 sec
574 ms
Visit jomarcorp.com now to see the best up-to-date Jomar Corp content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about jomarcorp.com
Jomar is celebrating 50 years as the leading manufacturer of injection blow molding (IBM) machines. Contact us today for your IBM machine needs.
Visit jomarcorp.comWe analyzed Jomarcorp.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 4.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
jomarcorp.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.1 s
22/100
10%
Value14.9 s
0/100
25%
Value13.5 s
2/100
10%
Value2,750 ms
3/100
30%
Value0.028
100/100
15%
Value18.1 s
3/100
10%
1235 ms
54 ms
102 ms
108 ms
119 ms
Our browser made a total of 107 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (83 requests) were addressed to the original Jomarcorp.com, 9% (10 requests) were made to Gstatic.com and 5% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Jomarcorp.com.
Page size can be reduced by 599.0 kB (16%)
3.8 MB
3.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Jomarcorp.com main page is 3.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 114.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 114.4 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 7.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Jomar Corp images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 424.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 424.7 kB or 33% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 52.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jomarcorp.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 52.8 kB or 27% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 74 (75%)
99
25
The browser has sent 99 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jomar Corp. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 41 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 29 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
jomarcorp.com
1235 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
54 ms
sgr.css
102 ms
style.min.css
108 ms
cf7-builder.css
119 ms
font-awesome.min.css
115 ms
styles.css
114 ms
nectar-slider.css
150 ms
font-awesome-legacy.min.css
155 ms
grid-system.css
154 ms
style.css
227 ms
header-secondary-nav.css
174 ms
element-highlighted-text.css
158 ms
element-clients.css
200 ms
element-fancy-unordered-list.css
194 ms
caroufredsel.css
198 ms
element-recent-posts.css
201 ms
css
46 ms
responsive.css
222 ms
ascend.css
242 ms
menu-dynamic.css
260 ms
js_composer.min.css
246 ms
salient-dynamic-styles.css
288 ms
css
52 ms
sgr.js
271 ms
jquery.min.js
308 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
285 ms
js
83 ms
responsive.css
302 ms
styles.css
302 ms
style-non-critical.css
394 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
395 ms
core.css
396 ms
index.js
395 ms
index.js
396 ms
anime.min.js
397 ms
nectar-slider.js
507 ms
jquery.easing.min.js
397 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
397 ms
api.js
63 ms
loader.js
43 ms
jsapi
66 ms
js
83 ms
priority.js
398 ms
nectar-slider-priority.js
355 ms
loader.js
5 ms
transit.min.js
414 ms
waypoints.js
407 ms
imagesLoaded.min.js
404 ms
hoverintent.min.js
402 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.js
532 ms
touchswipe.min.js
497 ms
caroufredsel.min.js
496 ms
superfish.js
491 ms
init.js
494 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
475 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
460 ms
index.js
453 ms
base.js
452 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
451 ms
shortcode.js
429 ms
responsive.js
421 ms
en-us.svg
325 ms
ar.svg
326 ms
zh-CN.svg
332 ms
nl.svg
331 ms
fr.svg
333 ms
de.svg
334 ms
it.svg
456 ms
ja.svg
453 ms
ko.svg
394 ms
pt.svg
387 ms
ru.svg
394 ms
es.svg
507 ms
200w.png
506 ms
jomar-molds.jpg
531 ms
placeholder.png
503 ms
rendering-AE25-HY-600x403.jpg
504 ms
Jomar_85s_Gen2_MachineComp-600x403.jpg
502 ms
IMG_3591-600x403.jpg
644 ms
js
228 ms
analytics.js
222 ms
goya.png
538 ms
merck.png
537 ms
pguni.png
691 ms
crayola.png
770 ms
avon.png
535 ms
gerber.png
637 ms
white.png
558 ms
jomarcorp.com
1272 ms
HDD_5275.jpg
830 ms
P1022509-2.jpg
787 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1xZosUZiYA.ttf
386 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVc.ttf
487 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf
541 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf
575 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVc.ttf
576 ms
icomoon.woff
620 ms
recaptcha__en.js
344 ms
loader.js
420 ms
collect
381 ms
tooltip.css
8 ms
util.css
8 ms
jsapi_compiled_format_module.js
81 ms
jsapi_compiled_default_module.js
81 ms
jsapi_compiled_ui_module.js
129 ms
jsapi_compiled_geochart_module.js
128 ms
jomarcorp.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
jomarcorp.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
jomarcorp.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jomarcorp.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Jomarcorp.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
jomarcorp.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Jomar Corp. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: