1.6 sec in total
375 ms
1.1 sec
138 ms
Visit jonesandvandermeer.com now to see the best up-to-date Jones And Vandermeer content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about jonesandvandermeer.com
Jones & Vandermeer is an online yarn shop offering a wide variety of hand-knitting yarns, fabrics, and other curious craft materials.
Visit jonesandvandermeer.comWe analyzed Jonesandvandermeer.com page load time and found that the first response time was 375 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.
jonesandvandermeer.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.5 s
35/100
10%
Value7.8 s
3/100
25%
Value5.7 s
52/100
10%
Value350 ms
73/100
30%
Value0.124
83/100
15%
Value9.0 s
33/100
10%
375 ms
23 ms
20 ms
48 ms
16 ms
Our browser made a total of 71 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Jonesandvandermeer.com, 25% (18 requests) were made to Cdn2.bigcommerce.com and 20% (14 requests) were made to Cdn4.bigcommerce.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (375 ms) belongs to the original domain Jonesandvandermeer.com.
Page size can be reduced by 557.1 kB (36%)
1.5 MB
991.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Jonesandvandermeer.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 781.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 24.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 24.8 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 459 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Jones And Vandermeer images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 531.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 531.8 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered.
Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (66%)
62
21
The browser has sent 62 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jones And Vandermeer. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 39 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.jonesandvandermeer.com
375 ms
styles.css
23 ms
mods.css
20 ms
modernizr.foundation.js
48 ms
jquery.min.js
16 ms
viewport.js
43 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
81 ms
jquery.validate.js
96 ms
product.functions.js
77 ms
product.attributes.js
76 ms
quickview.js
76 ms
quickview.initialise.js
75 ms
jquery.form.js
101 ms
imodal.js
103 ms
quicksearch.js
96 ms
foundation.min.js
41 ms
common.js
39 ms
jquery.zoomie.js
38 ms
jquery.touchwipe.min.js
35 ms
jquery.fittext.js
39 ms
template.js
70 ms
jquery.fancybox.pack.js
39 ms
jquery.fancybox-thumbs.js
39 ms
jquery.validate.js
42 ms
jquery.form.js
39 ms
product.attributes.js
90 ms
product.functions.js
39 ms
product.js
41 ms
bc_pinstrumentation.min.js
90 ms
visitor.js
90 ms
2e1e6e
38 ms
css
21 ms
analytics.js
30 ms
beacon_api.js
29 ms
analytics.min.js
159 ms
ga.js
158 ms
icon-shopping-bag.gif
156 ms
loader0.js
146 ms
index.php
112 ms
logolarge02_1434047829__88540.jpg
36 ms
Liberty-AW17.jpg
39 ms
clever-camel-and-wild-camels__51594.jpg
38 ms
Liberty-Little-land-of-Rhyme.jpg
41 ms
Garthenor.jpg
40 ms
promo01.jpg
41 ms
house-of-dg-watercolour-animals.jpg
41 ms
promo03.jpg
76 ms
footer-line-top.gif
72 ms
footer-top-tag.gif
73 ms
footer-subscribe.gif
73 ms
footer-line-bottom.gif
74 ms
footer-blog.gif
75 ms
right-arrow.png
85 ms
left-arrow.png
83 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
19 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
23 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
55 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
24 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-honF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
54 ms
2E1E6E_0_0.woff
57 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
19 ms
collect
23 ms
fornax.min.js
28 ms
app.js
24 ms
2928-550-10-1274.js
12 ms
22d080bd
118 ms
c
118 ms
application2.js
7 ms
22d080bd
52 ms
storage.html
11 ms
storage.js
2 ms
jonesandvandermeer.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
jonesandvandermeer.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
jonesandvandermeer.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
![]()
EN
![]()
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jonesandvandermeer.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Jonesandvandermeer.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
jonesandvandermeer.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Jones And Vandermeer. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: