3.2 sec in total
248 ms
2.5 sec
442 ms
Click here to check amazing Jonite content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about jonite.us
Jonite provides grating that is corrosion, rust, and slip resistant. Our grates are fit for a number of applications. Explore our decorative stone grating now.
Visit jonite.usWe analyzed Jonite.us page load time and found that the first response time was 248 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
jonite.us performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
54/100
10%
Value4.8 s
30/100
25%
Value4.1 s
80/100
10%
Value580 ms
51/100
30%
Value0.013
100/100
15%
Value8.3 s
40/100
10%
248 ms
42 ms
47 ms
60 ms
72 ms
Our browser made a total of 110 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 59% of them (65 requests) were addressed to the original Jonite.us, 23% (25 requests) were made to Maps.google.com and 7% (8 requests) were made to Maps.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (497 ms) belongs to the original domain Jonite.us.
Page size can be reduced by 1.5 MB (38%)
4.0 MB
2.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Jonite.us main page is 4.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 48.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 48.7 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 170.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Jonite images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 868.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 868.9 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 428.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jonite.us needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 428.0 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 44 (43%)
102
58
The browser has sent 102 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jonite. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
jonite.us
248 ms
widgetkit-cb2881ed.css
42 ms
rokbox.css
47 ms
mootools-core.js
60 ms
jquery.min.js
72 ms
jquery-noconflict.js
36 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
49 ms
core.js
50 ms
mootools-more.js
89 ms
scrolltotop_mt.js
58 ms
widgetkit-d796f2d7.js
70 ms
rokbox.js
114 ms
bootstrap.css
83 ms
theme.css
128 ms
custom.css
113 ms
jason-custom.css
132 ms
blog-custom.css
133 ms
uikit.js
134 ms
autocomplete.js
133 ms
search.js
133 ms
social.js
133 ms
theme.js
134 ms
jquery.fancybox.pack.js
134 ms
custom.js
133 ms
respond.js
134 ms
lightbox.js
25 ms
mediaelement-and-player.js
29 ms
spotlight.js
27 ms
css
43 ms
custom2.css
22 ms
jonite-logo.png
280 ms
analytics.js
282 ms
slideshow.js
112 ms
slider.js
104 ms
map.js
106 ms
jonite-logo_sm.png
32 ms
none
497 ms
banner_01.jpg
75 ms
slide_blank.png
74 ms
banner_02.jpg
75 ms
banner_03.jpg
75 ms
photo5-5fc458b297.jpg
103 ms
photo6-fdae228f31.jpg
104 ms
photo7-677ec3bd20.jpg
103 ms
photo8-ba817072c0.jpg
104 ms
subtle_dots.png
106 ms
landscape04c-7fe3cbd1a3.jpg
107 ms
landscape05c-f9651e05fe.jpg
109 ms
landscape07c-ce28f407c8.jpg
110 ms
landscape08c-27a8891217.jpg
137 ms
landscape09c-09e797911e.jpg
138 ms
landscape11e-a2704002ab.jpg
139 ms
landscape09d-ad5b7e48f1.jpg
140 ms
landscape11d-fa6df3a8f1.jpg
150 ms
landscape13d-ab3f4138b5.jpg
150 ms
landscape17e-3fcce75fdb.jpg
150 ms
landscape13c-16a63062bf.jpg
149 ms
landscape17d-6a5ad9a6e7.jpg
167 ms
landscape19c-56f331aa6a.jpg
166 ms
landscape24c-1f412d8c4c.jpg
163 ms
landscape25c-ee080339e7.jpg
165 ms
landscape28c-3adaed09a3.jpg
164 ms
blogspot-icon.png
206 ms
jonite-top.png
208 ms
close.png
207 ms
blank.gif
207 ms
9k-RPmcnxYEPm8CNFsH2gg.woff
77 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
215 ms
js
77 ms
collect
21 ms
common.js
21 ms
map.js
33 ms
util.js
33 ms
marker.js
30 ms
onion.js
36 ms
openhand_8_8.cur
306 ms
ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo
368 ms
controls.js
10 ms
infowindow.js
35 ms
transparent.png
37 ms
css
30 ms
jonite.png
170 ms
google_white5.png
23 ms
mapcnt6.png
37 ms
sv9.png
37 ms
tmapctrl.png
18 ms
cb_scout5.png
50 ms
tmapctrl4.png
47 ms
2UX7WLTfW3W8TclTUvlFyQ.woff
4 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
18 ms
Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
31 ms
d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOD8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
31 ms
vt
33 ms
vt
23 ms
vt
23 ms
vt
23 ms
vt
29 ms
vt
34 ms
vt
36 ms
vt
33 ms
vt
36 ms
vt
35 ms
vt
41 ms
vt
44 ms
vt
76 ms
vt
69 ms
vt
111 ms
vt
97 ms
vt
89 ms
AuthenticationService.Authenticate
44 ms
jonite.us accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
jonite.us best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
jonite.us SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jonite.us can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Jonite.us main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
jonite.us
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Jonite. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: