27.6 sec in total
12.3 sec
14.9 sec
325 ms
Welcome to jonjon.com homepage info - get ready to check Jonjon best content right away, or after learning these important things about jonjon.com
Dating tips
Visit jonjon.comWe analyzed Jonjon.com page load time and found that the first response time was 12.3 sec and then it took 15.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
jonjon.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
39/100
10%
Value4.6 s
35/100
25%
Value3.5 s
88/100
10%
Value160 ms
94/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value4.5 s
82/100
10%
12328 ms
182 ms
184 ms
341 ms
365 ms
Our browser made a total of 51 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 39% of them (20 requests) were addressed to the original Jonjon.com, 14% (7 requests) were made to Resources.infolinks.com and 14% (7 requests) were made to Image2.pubmatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (12.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Jonjon.com.
Page size can be reduced by 404.3 kB (63%)
644.9 kB
240.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Jonjon.com main page is 644.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 513.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 50.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 50.7 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Jonjon images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 336.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 336.7 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 15.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jonjon.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 15.8 kB or 78% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (54%)
48
22
The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jonjon. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.jonjon.com
12328 ms
style.css
182 ms
superfish.css
184 ms
coin-slider-styles.css
341 ms
jquery-1.4.2.min.js
365 ms
hoverintent.js
275 ms
superfish.js
381 ms
coin-slider.min.js
495 ms
custom.js
377 ms
cufon-yui.js
513 ms
cufon-TitilliumText14L.js
458 ms
cufon-run.js
458 ms
pagenavi-css.css
582 ms
defaults.css
546 ms
young-couple-20120824.css
547 ms
wp-embed.min.js
596 ms
infolinks_main.js
61 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
95 ms
owa.tracker-combined-min.js
594 ms
header_bg.gif
92 ms
shade.png
347 ms
young-couple-20120824.jpg
674 ms
user_sync.html
185 ms
usersyncup-an.html
187 ms
ice.js
187 ms
showad.js
73 ms
14584924022461
153 ms
PugMaster
23 ms
pixel
15 ms
Pug
21 ms
usersync.aspx
18 ms
Pug
23 ms
pixel
13 ms
Pug
19 ms
Pug
19 ms
Pug
19 ms
Pug
18 ms
Pug
13 ms
FBLIS.html
61 ms
doq.htm
138 ms
mapuid
38 ms
log.php
245 ms
sdk.js
71 ms
loader.gif
130 ms
getads.htm
599 ms
loader-bg.png
58 ms
logo.png
93 ms
152 ms
xd_arbiter.php
74 ms
xd_arbiter.php
134 ms
xd_arbiter.php
40 ms
jonjon.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<input type="image"> elements do not have [alt] text
Form elements do not have associated labels
jonjon.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
jonjon.com SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jonjon.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Jonjon.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
jonjon.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Jonjon. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: