17.3 sec in total
133 ms
12.1 sec
5 sec
Welcome to joomduck.com homepage info - get ready to check Joomduck best content for Netherlands right away, or after learning these important things about joomduck.com
Joomla! extensions development. Introducing Community Builder Profile Pro, JomSocial Profile Pro, Magic Window, PayPal Payment and Download Manager extensions, Community Builder Templates.
Visit joomduck.comWe analyzed Joomduck.com page load time and found that the first response time was 133 ms and then it took 17.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.
joomduck.com performance score
133 ms
877 ms
285 ms
364 ms
290 ms
Our browser made a total of 69 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (61 requests) were addressed to the original Joomduck.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Code.jivosite.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) relates to the external source Apis.google.com.
Page size can be reduced by 346.7 kB (60%)
582.4 kB
235.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Joomduck.com main page is 582.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 342.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 15.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 15.5 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 15.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Joomduck needs image optimization as it can save up to 15.3 kB or 15% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 219.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 219.5 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 96.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Joomduck.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 96.4 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 43 (65%)
66
23
The browser has sent 66 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Joomduck. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 29 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
joomduck.com
133 ms
www.joomduck.com
877 ms
widgetkit-a3c33678.css
285 ms
mootools-core.js
364 ms
core.js
290 ms
caption.js
290 ms
jquery.js
932 ms
widgetkit-8aea3d68.js
909 ms
base.css
910 ms
layout.css
909 ms
menus.css
909 ms
modules.css
1529 ms
tools.css
1580 ms
system.css
1627 ms
extensions.css
1626 ms
custom.css
1581 ms
trebuchet.css
1625 ms
opensans.css
1627 ms
opensans.css
1654 ms
style.css
1653 ms
responsive.css
1606 ms
print.css
1653 ms
opensans.css
1570 ms
warp.js
1570 ms
responsive.js
1626 ms
accordionmenu.js
1625 ms
dropdownmenu.js
1617 ms
template.js
1618 ms
lightbox.js
245 ms
mediaelement-and-player.js
446 ms
spotlight.js
367 ms
base.css
365 ms
layout.css
354 ms
menus.css
477 ms
modules.css
510 ms
tools.css
460 ms
system.css
646 ms
responsive.css
722 ms
print.css
680 ms
menus.css
385 ms
system.css
142 ms
system.css
65 ms
system-all.css
66 ms
responsive.css
83 ms
logo.png
153 ms
logo_default.png
106 ms
logo_default.png
91 ms
logo_default.png
353 ms
joomla.png
349 ms
outgoing.png
342 ms
watch.png
336 ms
ga.js
267 ms
icons_social_small.png
1206 ms
__utm.gif
45 ms
7b73795c64c15c7c41f273e17ee3b38fa52a04cf.html
680 ms
totop_scroller.png
39 ms
menu_line_item.png
523 ms
OpenSans-Light-webfont.woff
480 ms
122128
1555 ms
logo_small.png
754 ms
widgets.js
185 ms
plusone.js
1720 ms
all.js
1686 ms
menu_dropdown_level3.png
1606 ms
logo_small.png
1642 ms
logo_small.png
1642 ms
icon_support.png
1641 ms
icon_question.png
1641 ms
122128
1535 ms
joomduck.com SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Joomduck.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Joomduck.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
joomduck.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Joomduck. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: