4.7 sec in total
313 ms
3.5 sec
916 ms
Welcome to joomlackeditor.com homepage info - get ready to check Joomlack Editor best content right away, or after learning these important things about joomlackeditor.com
Standard Content Editing Core Joomla Articles, Categories, Custom HTML Modules and 3rd Party extensions Source Code Editing Core Joomla Articles, Categories, Custom HTML
Visit joomlackeditor.comWe analyzed Joomlackeditor.com page load time and found that the first response time was 313 ms and then it took 4.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
joomlackeditor.com performance score
313 ms
1314 ms
637 ms
713 ms
157 ms
Our browser made a total of 75 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Joomlackeditor.com, 80% (60 requests) were made to Arkextensions.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Joomla.org. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) relates to the external source Arkextensions.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.3 MB (69%)
1.9 MB
576.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Joomlackeditor.com main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 883.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 30.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 30.5 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 8.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Joomlack Editor images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 636.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 636.5 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 599.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Joomlackeditor.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 599.9 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 42 (69%)
61
19
The browser has sent 61 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Joomlack Editor. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 22 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
joomlackeditor.com
313 ms
jck-editor
1314 ms
index.php
637 ms
index.php
713 ms
github.css
157 ms
font-awesome.min.css
234 ms
bootstrap.min.css
389 ms
bootstrap-responsive.min.css
238 ms
bootstrap-extended.css
236 ms
xi-ui.css
466 ms
xi.css
312 ms
bootstrap-override.css
313 ms
payplans.css
398 ms
site.css
400 ms
widgetkit-5ded5cd6.css
543 ms
style.css
473 ms
theme5.css.php
573 ms
modal.css
542 ms
highlight.pack.js
622 ms
jquery.min.js
1084 ms
jquery-noconflict.js
620 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
649 ms
bootstrap.min.js
697 ms
mootools-core.js
853 ms
core.js
716 ms
xi.core.js
727 ms
xi.lib.js
775 ms
jquery-validate.js
859 ms
payplans.js
860 ms
mootools-more.js
1191 ms
site.js
853 ms
widgetkit-9060907b.js
930 ms
theme5.js
931 ms
mootools-more-light.js
936 ms
modal.js
938 ms
modal.image2.js
1007 ms
bootstrap.css
1259 ms
theme.css
1082 ms
custom.css
1027 ms
uikit.js
941 ms
social.js
930 ms
theme.js
943 ms
css
25 ms
lightbox.js
82 ms
mediaelement-and-player.js
308 ms
spotlight.js
88 ms
css
31 ms
css
97 ms
joomla_bussup_sm.png
167 ms
gradient1.svg
150 ms
gradient2.svg
156 ms
gradient3.svg
158 ms
Ark-White-xs.svg
151 ms
tm-block-dark-bg.jpg
168 ms
ARKEXT-app-JCKEditor-icon.png
152 ms
JCK_Editor_landing_page.png
340 ms
badge.png
166 ms
joomla_soldev_sm.png
164 ms
yNZkEnhwnBUaXAL8M0Uk6A.ttf
243 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
182 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
243 ms
nj47mAZe0mYUIySgfn0wpQ.ttf
181 ms
IcoMoon.woff
242 ms
UyYrYy3ltEffJV9QueSi4UpeNX8RPf6i6WQfJWyCWEs.ttf
242 ms
Q_pTky3Sc3ubRibGToTAYjnFfol0SnfBMmbnmUK0fZM.ttf
243 ms
joomla_bussup_sm.png
334 ms
joomla_soldev_sm.png
333 ms
totop_scroller.svg
165 ms
analytics.js
199 ms
,
111 ms
slideshow.js
115 ms
mobile-menu-icon.png
132 ms
JCK_Editor_landing_page3.png
80 ms
JCK_Editor_landing_page4.png
81 ms
collect
13 ms
joomlackeditor.com SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Joomlackeditor.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Joomlackeditor.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
joomlackeditor.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Joomlack Editor. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: