2.1 sec in total
398 ms
1.4 sec
241 ms
Visit joomlavogue.com now to see the best up-to-date Joomla Vogue content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about joomlavogue.com
Visit joomlavogue.comWe analyzed Joomlavogue.com page load time and found that the first response time was 398 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
joomlavogue.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.7 s
0/100
10%
Value8.8 s
1/100
25%
Value10.7 s
7/100
10%
Value2,530 ms
4/100
30%
Value0.554
13/100
15%
Value19.9 s
2/100
10%
398 ms
51 ms
72 ms
291 ms
115 ms
Our browser made a total of 77 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 74% of them (57 requests) were addressed to the original Joomlavogue.com, 13% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (494 ms) belongs to the original domain Joomlavogue.com.
Page size can be reduced by 810.6 kB (34%)
2.4 MB
1.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Joomlavogue.com main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 128.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 128.5 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 370.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Joomla Vogue needs image optimization as it can save up to 370.1 kB or 28% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 131.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 131.4 kB or 28% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 180.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Joomlavogue.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 180.7 kB or 42% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (52%)
65
31
The browser has sent 65 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Joomla Vogue. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
joomlavogue.com
398 ms
analytics.js
51 ms
style.min.css
72 ms
styles.css
291 ms
go_pricing_styles.css
115 ms
tp_twitter_plugin.css
96 ms
rs6.css
117 ms
css
75 ms
js_composer.min.css
134 ms
css
90 ms
main.min.css
159 ms
font-awesome.min.css
120 ms
fontello.css
155 ms
main-b764353b69.css
157 ms
custom-b764353b69.css
246 ms
media-b764353b69.css
243 ms
style.css
243 ms
TweenMax.min.js
72 ms
jquery.min.js
244 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
244 ms
revolution.tools.min.js
258 ms
rs6.min.js
259 ms
above-the-fold.min.js
244 ms
google_analytics_auto.js
253 ms
css
84 ms
index.js
403 ms
index.js
362 ms
go_pricing_scripts.js
251 ms
main.js
264 ms
api.js
81 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
251 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
256 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
256 ms
index.js
494 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
338 ms
collect
16 ms
js
94 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVQ.woff
62 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVQ.woff
62 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVQ.woff
152 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVQ.woff
185 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVQ.woff
185 ms
ga.js
163 ms
happy-bg.jpg
115 ms
happy-people.png
144 ms
happy-wp-logo.png
144 ms
happy-wp-text.png
116 ms
happy-vc-logo.png
142 ms
happy-vc-text.png
261 ms
happy-rev-logo.png
262 ms
happy-rev-text.png
263 ms
happy-woo-logo.png
262 ms
happy-woo-text.png
261 ms
happy-wpml-logo.png
260 ms
happy-wpml-text.png
263 ms
happy-seo-logo.png
264 ms
happy-seo-text.png
263 ms
service-01.jpg
264 ms
service-02.jpg
263 ms
service-03.jpg
264 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
244 ms
Logo.png
85 ms
logo5.jpg
43 ms
logo7.jpg
42 ms
logo3.jpg
42 ms
logo4.jpg
45 ms
logo6.jpg
43 ms
logo8.jpg
41 ms
logo1.jpg
74 ms
logo2.jpg
74 ms
Lgo_V.png
72 ms
__utm.gif
22 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff
15 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff
16 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc-.woff
15 ms
ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyUypcBO5Xo.woff
15 ms
ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyUbpcBO5Xo.woff
17 ms
joomlavogue.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
joomlavogue.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Joomlavogue.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Joomlavogue.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
joomlavogue.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Joomla Vogue. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: