4.3 sec in total
1.2 sec
2.8 sec
344 ms
Welcome to joop.in homepage info - get ready to check Joop best content for Turkey right away, or after learning these important things about joop.in
Visit joop.inWe analyzed Joop.in page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
joop.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.0 s
23/100
10%
Value5.2 s
24/100
25%
Value4.3 s
75/100
10%
Value10 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value4.2 s
85/100
10%
1163 ms
90 ms
179 ms
28 ms
241 ms
Our browser made a total of 37 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (31 requests) were addressed to the original Joop.in, 5% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Joop.in.
Page size can be reduced by 408.8 kB (14%)
3.0 MB
2.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Joop.in main page is 3.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 35.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.7 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 35.1 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 102.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Joop images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 170.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 170.7 kB or 63% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 101.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Joop.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 101.0 kB or 72% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (43%)
35
20
The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Joop. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.joop.in
1163 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
90 ms
style-new.css
179 ms
font-awesome.min.css
28 ms
tooltipster.min.css
241 ms
featherlight.min.css
246 ms
style.css
332 ms
css
57 ms
jquery.js
348 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
266 ms
script.js
272 ms
jquery.tooltipster.min.js
320 ms
featherlight.min.js
327 ms
oldie.js
371 ms
jquery.assets.js
456 ms
jquery.custom.js
422 ms
wp-embed.min.js
427 ms
logo_joop.png
351 ms
joop-dorresteijn-suna-cho.png
351 ms
section-header.png
325 ms
office_1.png
640 ms
IMG_2667.jpg
489 ms
102565607_6abf93e32c_o1-150x150.jpg
350 ms
donaldduck_sanoma_redactie.jpg
496 ms
titles.png
676 ms
miaatthebeach.png
968 ms
duckworld.png
743 ms
collage-2015-08-30-1.jpg
739 ms
watching-the-game.jpg
758 ms
van.jpg
721 ms
inception.jpg
850 ms
quadhummer.jpg
802 ms
analytics.js
286 ms
icomoon.svg
789 ms
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
4 ms
88x31.png
282 ms
collect
13 ms
joop.in accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
joop.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
joop.in SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Joop.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Joop.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
joop.in
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Joop. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: