Tools & Wizards About Us
journal-discussion.ru screenshot

Report Summary

  • 95

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    93% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 88% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

journal-discussion.ru

ДИСКУССИЯ | DISCUSSION | Journal of scientific publications on economic

Page Load Speed

1.1 sec in total

First Response

160 ms

Resources Loaded

790 ms

Page Rendered

158 ms

journal-discussion.ru screenshot

About Website

Visit journal-discussion.ru now to see the best up-to-date Journal DISCUSSION content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about journal-discussion.ru

Журнал Дискуссия входит в Список журналов ВАК. Цель журнала «Дискуссия» — создание дискуссионной площадки для ученых работающих в области решения проблем развития общественной и экономической жизни ро...

Visit journal-discussion.ru

Key Findings

We analyzed Journal-discussion.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 160 ms and then it took 948 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

journal-discussion.ru performance score

95

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

71/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

92/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.5 s

98/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.4 s

98/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

journal-discussion.ru

160 ms

circusekb.ru

469 ms

location.js

2 ms

extend-native-history-api.js

2 ms

requests.js

2 ms

Our browser made a total of 7 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 14% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Journal-discussion.ru, 43% (3 requests) were made to Circusekb.ru and 14% (1 request) were made to Journal-discussion.ru. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (469 ms) relates to the external source Circusekb.ru.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 582.5 kB (18%)

Content Size

3.3 MB

After Optimization

2.7 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Journal-discussion.ru main page is 3.3 MB. This result falls within a big category (top 100 000) of medium weight web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 191.4 kB

  • Original 233.0 kB
  • After minification 232.8 kB
  • After compression 41.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 191.4 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 217.6 kB

  • Original 2.8 MB
  • After minification 2.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Journal DISCUSSION images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-57%

Potential reduce by 75.1 kB

  • Original 132.1 kB
  • After minification 131.3 kB
  • After compression 57.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 75.1 kB or 57% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 98.5 kB

  • Original 119.3 kB
  • After minification 117.3 kB
  • After compression 20.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Journal-discussion.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 98.5 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

1

After Optimization

1

  • CSS

The browser has sent 1 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Journal DISCUSSION. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

journal-discussion.ru

journal-discussion.ru

160 ms

circusekb.ru

circusekb.ru

469 ms

location.js

location.js

2 ms

extend-native-history-api.js

extend-native-history-api.js

2 ms

requests.js

requests.js

2 ms

css2

css2

215 ms

style.css

style.css

28 ms

Accessibility Review

journal-discussion.ru accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

journal-discussion.ru best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

journal-discussion.ru SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    RU

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Journal-discussion.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Journal-discussion.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

journal-discussion.ru

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Journal DISCUSSION. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: