1.8 sec in total
73 ms
1.5 sec
255 ms
Click here to check amazing JSWC content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about jswc.com
MarkUpgrade: We help visionary entrepreneurs secure extraordinary domain names to power their brands to success.
Visit jswc.comWe analyzed Jswc.com page load time and found that the first response time was 73 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
jswc.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.9 s
26/100
10%
Value4.0 s
49/100
25%
Value5.4 s
56/100
10%
Value1,170 ms
21/100
30%
Value0.02
100/100
15%
Value7.4 s
49/100
10%
73 ms
407 ms
19 ms
98 ms
21 ms
Our browser made a total of 76 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Jswc.com, 7% (5 requests) were made to Gstatic.com and 7% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (512 ms) relates to the external source Enaming.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.0 MB (65%)
1.6 MB
551.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Jswc.com main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 897.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 63.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 63.4 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 42.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, JSWC needs image optimization as it can save up to 42.0 kB or 21% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 589.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 589.1 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 350.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jswc.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 350.7 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 50 (75%)
67
17
The browser has sent 67 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of JSWC. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 26 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
73 ms
407 ms
style.css
19 ms
jquery.min.js
98 ms
style.css
21 ms
style-ribbons.css
34 ms
ParaAdmin.css
29 ms
style.css
39 ms
cache.skin.css
65 ms
mp-stacks-style.css
40 ms
lightbox.css
60 ms
styles.css
60 ms
bootstrap.min.css
81 ms
styles.css
62 ms
jquery.accordion.css
61 ms
tmm_custom_style.min.css
65 ms
css
161 ms
icomoon.css
82 ms
font-awesome.css
79 ms
font-awesome.min.css
79 ms
default.min.css
79 ms
jquery.js
88 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
87 ms
scripts.js
86 ms
jquery.tablednd.js
86 ms
jquery.dragtable.js
86 ms
jscolor.js
87 ms
ParaAdmin.js
89 ms
scripts.js
88 ms
jquery.accordion.js
88 ms
easy-columns.css
89 ms
frontend.css
88 ms
frontend.js
89 ms
addthis_widget.js
100 ms
output.css
89 ms
jquery.form.min.js
91 ms
elementQuery.min.js
91 ms
lightbox.js
92 ms
mp-stacks-front-end.js
90 ms
scripts.js
92 ms
api.js
95 ms
reset.css
90 ms
wp.css
94 ms
post-content.css
92 ms
menu_functions.js
80 ms
wp-embed.min.js
135 ms
functions.js
124 ms
ga.js
504 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
213 ms
analytics.js
496 ms
recaptcha__en.js
476 ms
logo-enaming.png
280 ms
image-page-header.jpg
282 ms
512 ms
8fd0aa836412853f9fd25e4cd662b1b4.jpg
278 ms
sprite.png
278 ms
ajax-loader.gif
275 ms
_dCzxpXzIS3sL-gdJWAP8A.ttf
349 ms
LAQwev4hdCtYkOYX4Oc7nPesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf
396 ms
UDfD6oxBaBnmFJwQ7XAFNw.ttf
397 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
268 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
268 ms
icomoon.svg
398 ms
__utm.gif
36 ms
collect
53 ms
fallback
111 ms
fallback__ltr.css
5 ms
payload
14 ms
css
17 ms
logo_48.png
6 ms
refresh.png
4 ms
audio.png
5 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
5 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
6 ms
300lo.json
51 ms
sh.8e5f85691f9aaa082472a194.html
34 ms
jswc.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
jswc.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
jswc.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Page is blocked from indexing
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jswc.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Jswc.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
jswc.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of JSWC. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: