Tools & Wizards About Us
julesandkate.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 43

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    62% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 88% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

julesandkate.com

Women's accessories | jules + kate

Page Load Speed

1.2 sec in total

First Response

126 ms

Resources Loaded

990 ms

Page Rendered

74 ms

julesandkate.com screenshot

About Website

Visit julesandkate.com now to see the best up-to-date Jules And Kate content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about julesandkate.com

jules + kate features a carefully curated selection of accessories for women and the home. Each item is hand-selected for high quality and style.

Visit julesandkate.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Julesandkate.com page load time and found that the first response time was 126 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

julesandkate.com performance score

43

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

57/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

78/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.5 s

11/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,440 ms

5/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.007

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value19.0 s

3/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.julesandkate.com

126 ms

minified.js

90 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

163 ms

polyfill.min.js

164 ms

8875.5956d950.bundle.min.js

81 ms

Our browser made a total of 31 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Julesandkate.com, 45% (14 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 39% (12 requests) were made to Sentry-next.wixpress.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (475 ms) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 624.0 kB (60%)

Content Size

1.0 MB

After Optimization

416.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Julesandkate.com main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 764.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 619.7 kB

  • Original 764.8 kB
  • After minification 763.0 kB
  • After compression 145.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 619.7 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 4.2 kB
  • After minification 4.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Jules And Kate images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 4.3 kB

  • Original 271.6 kB
  • After minification 271.5 kB
  • After compression 267.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (67%)

Requests Now

18

After Optimization

6

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 18 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jules And Kate. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.julesandkate.com

www.julesandkate.com

126 ms

minified.js

minified.js

90 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

focus-within-polyfill.js

163 ms

polyfill.min.js

polyfill.min.js

164 ms

8875.5956d950.bundle.min.js

8875.5956d950.bundle.min.js

81 ms

thunderbolt-commons.6abcfe1a.bundle.min.js

thunderbolt-commons.6abcfe1a.bundle.min.js

300 ms

main.e9b48348.bundle.min.js

main.e9b48348.bundle.min.js

300 ms

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

299 ms

lodash.min.js

lodash.min.js

299 ms

react.production.min.js

react.production.min.js

304 ms

react-dom.production.min.js

react-dom.production.min.js

306 ms

browser-deprecation.bundle.es5.js

browser-deprecation.bundle.es5.js

306 ms

siteTags.bundle.min.js

siteTags.bundle.min.js

302 ms

bf9ed4_72be67a8a3e84a05b29e04ddd786c7a3~mv2.jpg

bf9ed4_72be67a8a3e84a05b29e04ddd786c7a3~mv2.jpg

475 ms

bundle.min.js

bundle.min.js

205 ms

128 ms

121 ms

115 ms

120 ms

116 ms

114 ms

150 ms

144 ms

150 ms

147 ms

149 ms

142 ms

deprecation-en.v5.html

deprecation-en.v5.html

7 ms

bolt-performance

bolt-performance

17 ms

deprecation-style.v5.css

deprecation-style.v5.css

11 ms

right-arrow.svg

right-arrow.svg

8 ms

Accessibility Review

julesandkate.com accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best Practices

julesandkate.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

julesandkate.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Julesandkate.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Julesandkate.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

julesandkate.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Jules And Kate. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: