2.1 sec in total
300 ms
1.7 sec
156 ms
Click here to check amazing Julius Clinical content for Netherlands. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about juliusclinical.com
We’re an academic CRO who’s set apart by our unique triangle of science, networks, & operational excellence.
Visit juliusclinical.comWe analyzed Juliusclinical.com page load time and found that the first response time was 300 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
juliusclinical.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.0 s
4/100
10%
Value15.5 s
0/100
25%
Value10.5 s
7/100
10%
Value170 ms
92/100
30%
Value0.369
29/100
15%
Value11.4 s
19/100
10%
300 ms
86 ms
170 ms
172 ms
171 ms
Our browser made a total of 67 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (53 requests) were addressed to the original Juliusclinical.com, 7% (5 requests) were made to Ssl.google-analytics.com and 6% (4 requests) were made to F.vimeocdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (936 ms) belongs to the original domain Juliusclinical.com.
Page size can be reduced by 655.1 kB (34%)
1.9 MB
1.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Juliusclinical.com main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 21.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.0 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 21.9 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 20.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Julius Clinical images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 455.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 455.3 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 157.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Juliusclinical.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 157.1 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (45%)
66
36
The browser has sent 66 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Julius Clinical. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
juliusclinical.com
300 ms
system.base.css
86 ms
reset.css
170 ms
field.css
172 ms
user.css
171 ms
ckeditor.css
173 ms
ctools.css
172 ms
extlink.css
173 ms
all.css
259 ms
jquery.min.js
352 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
256 ms
jquery.once.js
254 ms
drupal.js
270 ms
extlink.js
256 ms
googleanalytics.js
342 ms
froogaloop.min.js
340 ms
jquery.main.js
342 ms
json2.js
344 ms
jstorage.js
374 ms
analytics.js
62 ms
img_science.jpg
379 ms
illusie.png
92 ms
Happy_Holidays_Julius%20Clinical%202015_web.jpg
936 ms
sprite2.png
189 ms
bg-main.gif
91 ms
bullet.gif
91 ms
cycle-up.png
96 ms
rene.jpg
188 ms
cycle-down.png
188 ms
vd-Worp.jpg
189 ms
hiddo.jpg
191 ms
joost_hoekstra_0.jpg
267 ms
marco_alings.jpg
268 ms
EefjeJong_jpg_0.jpg
268 ms
michiel.jpg
266 ms
IlseSchrieks_jpg_0.jpg
269 ms
prof_fauser.png
434 ms
Eric_Duckers.PNG
433 ms
marc_bonten.jpg
353 ms
peter_blankestijn.jpg
356 ms
Rutten%20F.png
434 ms
x_ReneKahn.jpg
436 ms
Leonard%20van%20den%20Berg.jpg
437 ms
carlmoons.jpg
516 ms
louis_bont.jpg
526 ms
prof_algra.png
529 ms
dickdezeeuw.jpg
527 ms
gabriel.jpg
529 ms
video-player-poster.jpg
599 ms
video-player-button-sprite.png
610 ms
umc_utrecht_broad150px.jpg
611 ms
img-02a.png
330 ms
img-03a.jpg
333 ms
NB%20Grotesk-75R%20FettWeb.woff
694 ms
57450362
71 ms
collect
24 ms
player.js
114 ms
player.css
93 ms
ga.js
21 ms
vuid.min.js
111 ms
__utm.gif
33 ms
__utm.gif
60 ms
proxy.html
37 ms
398256036.jpg
62 ms
__utm.gif
23 ms
8353009_60x60.jpg
48 ms
__utm.gif
4 ms
juliusclinical.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
juliusclinical.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
juliusclinical.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Juliusclinical.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Juliusclinical.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
juliusclinical.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Julius Clinical. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: