Tools & Wizards About Us
juma.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 11

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    24% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

juma.org

Home - Juma

Page Load Speed

4.9 sec in total

First Response

149 ms

Resources Loaded

4.6 sec

Page Rendered

101 ms

juma.org screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Juma content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about juma.org

Make Possible, Possible.

Visit juma.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Juma.org page load time and found that the first response time was 149 ms and then it took 4.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

juma.org performance score

11

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

24/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value17.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value15.5 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,990 ms

8/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.285

42/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value18.7 s

3/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

juma.org

149 ms

www.juma.org

31 ms

www.juma.org

390 ms

hqo5vcf.css

241 ms

style.min.css

344 ms

Our browser made a total of 82 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (65 requests) were addressed to the original Juma.org, 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Juma.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 137.5 kB (14%)

Content Size

986.7 kB

After Optimization

849.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Juma.org main page is 986.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 665.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 83.1 kB

  • Original 101.3 kB
  • After minification 96.1 kB
  • After compression 18.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 83.1 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 6.5 kB

  • Original 128.5 kB
  • After minification 122.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Juma images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 38.3 kB

  • Original 665.5 kB
  • After minification 665.0 kB
  • After compression 627.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 9.6 kB

  • Original 91.4 kB
  • After minification 88.2 kB
  • After compression 81.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Juma.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 9.6 kB or 11% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 62 (82%)

Requests Now

76

After Optimization

14

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 76 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Juma. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 44 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

juma.org

juma.org

149 ms

www.juma.org

www.juma.org

31 ms

www.juma.org

www.juma.org

390 ms

hqo5vcf.css

hqo5vcf.css

241 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

344 ms

styles.css

styles.css

282 ms

button.css

button.css

24 ms

simpay-public.min.css

simpay-public.min.css

293 ms

simpay-public-pro.min.css

simpay-public-pro.min.css

283 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

354 ms

jquery-ui.min.css

jquery-ui.min.css

332 ms

style.css

style.css

549 ms

jquery.fancybox.min.css

jquery.fancybox.min.css

552 ms

flexslider.css

flexslider.css

564 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

608 ms

eventstyle.css

eventstyle.css

610 ms

style.css

style.css

637 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

816 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

828 ms

css

css

39 ms

css

css

56 ms

js

js

70 ms

rbtools.min.js

rbtools.min.js

917 ms

rs6.min.js

rs6.min.js

1010 ms

css

css

18 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

884 ms

rs6.css

rs6.css

884 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

1192 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

961 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

1121 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

1136 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

980 ms

index.js

index.js

1242 ms

index.js

index.js

1060 ms

rbtools.min.js

rbtools.min.js

1404 ms

rs6.min.js

rs6.min.js

1528 ms

26 ms

accounting.min.js

accounting.min.js

1200 ms

underscore-before.js

underscore-before.js

1991 ms

underscore.min.js

underscore.min.js

1992 ms

underscore-after.js

underscore-after.js

1274 ms

wp-util.min.js

wp-util.min.js

1503 ms

backbone.min.js

backbone.min.js

2262 ms

api-request.min.js

api-request.min.js

2998 ms

wp-api.min.js

wp-api.min.js

1575 ms

api.js

api.js

37 ms

dom-ready.min.js

dom-ready.min.js

2997 ms

p.css

p.css

35 ms

a11y.min.js

a11y.min.js

1618 ms

simpay-public-shared.js

simpay-public-shared.js

1686 ms

simpay-public.js

simpay-public.js

2772 ms

simpay-public-pro.js

simpay-public-pro.js

1857 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

2713 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

2492 ms

jquery.fancybox.min.js

jquery.fancybox.min.js

1909 ms

jquery.fitvids.js

jquery.fitvids.js

1983 ms

jquery.flexslider.js

jquery.flexslider.js

2047 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

2075 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

2720 ms

ketchup.all.js

ketchup.all.js

2281 ms

moment.min.js

moment.min.js

2257 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

73 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

91 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

89 ms

churchmain.js

churchmain.js

2278 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aXw.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aXw.woff

65 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aXw.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aXw.woff

66 ms

index.js

index.js

2191 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

2314 ms

collect

collect

32 ms

juma-logo1.png

juma-logo1.png

2271 ms

Facebook-1.png

Facebook-1.png

3104 ms

Twitter-1.png

Twitter-1.png

2233 ms

YouTube-1.png

YouTube-1.png

2194 ms

LinkedIn-1.png

LinkedIn-1.png

3005 ms

Instagram-1.png

Instagram-1.png

2165 ms

dummy.png

dummy.png

2152 ms

rise-150x150.png

rise-150x150.png

2343 ms

default-news-img.jpg

default-news-img.jpg

2452 ms

candid-seal-platinum-2023.png

candid-seal-platinum-2023.png

2150 ms

insight.min.js

insight.min.js

25 ms

insight_tag_errors.gif

insight_tag_errors.gif

75 ms

Accessibility Review

juma.org accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

juma.org best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

juma.org SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Juma.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Juma.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

juma.org

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Juma. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: