2.8 sec in total
48 ms
2.7 sec
53 ms
Welcome to jumble.com homepage info - get ready to check Jumble best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about jumble.com
Visit jumble.comWe analyzed Jumble.com page load time and found that the first response time was 48 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
jumble.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.1 s
81/100
10%
Value3.2 s
71/100
25%
Value3.5 s
87/100
10%
Value1,060 ms
25/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value11.8 s
17/100
10%
48 ms
34 ms
32 ms
1027 ms
62 ms
Our browser made a total of 40 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Jumble.com, 33% (13 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 30% (12 requests) were made to Sentry-next.wixpress.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) relates to the external source Polyfill-fastly.io.
Page size can be reduced by 303.0 kB (38%)
801.5 kB
498.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Jumble.com main page is 801.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 349.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 254.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 254.9 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Jumble images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 48.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 48.1 kB or 17% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (41%)
27
16
The browser has sent 27 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jumble. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.jumble.com
48 ms
minified.js
34 ms
focus-within-polyfill.js
32 ms
polyfill.min.js
1027 ms
thunderbolt-commons.fe3f62c0.bundle.min.js
62 ms
main.8fa1a37c.bundle.min.js
64 ms
main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js
60 ms
lodash.min.js
63 ms
react.production.min.js
61 ms
react-dom.production.min.js
64 ms
siteTags.bundle.min.js
62 ms
wix-perf-measure.umd.min.js
63 ms
b95917_014d065d1ab5489b985ea9b2b7714b32.jpg
131 ms
b95917_0625b667b26c4f18be476062ac16798e.jpg
136 ms
b95917_4d4e083db2e24179b5a303affa05ffcd.jpg
140 ms
Guest%20Jumbler%20Cover%20Sampson%20'22%20copy.jpg
144 ms
Jumble%20games.jpg
604 ms
b95917_a12296e8efd1466b87b43791781931ef~mv2.png
493 ms
Jumble%20Geography.jpg
144 ms
b95917_5d9a0d96c0d7494b8c293e9fafdd784a~mv2.jpg
144 ms
b95917_167014d51ce4464788e18fb1fc63b1d5.jpg
145 ms
b95917_6ea02df99fc140f9909ad33ec3d881f1.jpg
150 ms
b95917_359ec06f22a14d13aab7642b96086536~mv2_d_1580_1582_s_2.jpg
148 ms
bundle.min.js
37 ms
106 ms
95 ms
99 ms
99 ms
95 ms
94 ms
136 ms
134 ms
137 ms
134 ms
132 ms
133 ms
deprecation-en.v5.html
5 ms
bolt-performance
22 ms
deprecation-style.v5.css
7 ms
right-arrow.svg
5 ms
jumble.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
jumble.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
jumble.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jumble.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Jumble.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
jumble.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Jumble. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: