Tools & Wizards About Us
jumpjump.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 11

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    24% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 71% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

jumpjump.net

Dazzax Domains - Homepage

Page Load Speed

3.7 sec in total

First Response

270 ms

Resources Loaded

3.3 sec

Page Rendered

160 ms

jumpjump.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Jumpjump content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about jumpjump.net

Dazzax Domains owns a portfolio of internet domain names, both for its sister organisations and also for investment.

Visit jumpjump.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Jumpjump.net page load time and found that the first response time was 270 ms and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

jumpjump.net performance score

11

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value10.4 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value15.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.2 s

5/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,240 ms

19/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.369

29/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value16.4 s

5/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

jumpjump.net

270 ms

www.dazzax.com

324 ms

www.dazzax.com

1166 ms

bootstrap.min.css

156 ms

rokbox.css

233 ms

Our browser made a total of 49 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Jumpjump.net, 96% (47 requests) were made to Dazzax.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) relates to the external source Dazzax.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 847.7 kB (62%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

521.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Jumpjump.net main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 784.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 19.5 kB

  • Original 26.0 kB
  • After minification 23.5 kB
  • After compression 6.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 19.5 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 18.3 kB

  • Original 199.9 kB
  • After minification 181.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Jumpjump images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 512.9 kB

  • Original 784.6 kB
  • After minification 731.5 kB
  • After compression 271.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 512.9 kB or 65% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 296.9 kB

  • Original 359.0 kB
  • After minification 349.8 kB
  • After compression 62.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jumpjump.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 296.9 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (66%)

Requests Now

44

After Optimization

15

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 44 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jumpjump. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

jumpjump.net

jumpjump.net

270 ms

www.dazzax.com

www.dazzax.com

324 ms

www.dazzax.com

www.dazzax.com

1166 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

156 ms

rokbox.css

rokbox.css

233 ms

menu-3f3da3c257df8478ca828ecf98294e5d.css

menu-3f3da3c257df8478ca828ecf98294e5d.css

312 ms

grid-responsive.css

grid-responsive.css

388 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

541 ms

master-e4a8a9d91d096bd82f4651f1968f7edf.css

master-e4a8a9d91d096bd82f4651f1968f7edf.css

719 ms

mediaqueries.css

mediaqueries.css

618 ms

thirdparty-k2.css

thirdparty-k2.css

765 ms

rtl.css

rtl.css

695 ms

nsb-opac.css

nsb-opac.css

772 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

878 ms

jquery-noconflict.js

jquery-noconflict.js

831 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

842 ms

core.js

core.js

851 ms

jquery.touchSwipe.min.js

jquery.touchSwipe.min.js

984 ms

jquery.modals.min.js

jquery.modals.min.js

922 ms

script.min.js

script.min.js

931 ms

mootools-core.js

mootools-core.js

955 ms

mootools-more.js

mootools-more.js

1227 ms

rokbox.js

rokbox.js

1018 ms

browser-engines.js

browser-engines.js

1030 ms

rokmediaqueries.js

rokmediaqueries.js

1059 ms

video.js

video.js

1086 ms

rokmediaqueries.js

rokmediaqueries.js

1107 ms

responsive.js

responsive.js

1136 ms

videobox.css

videobox.css

1162 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

1184 ms

videobox.js

videobox.js

1213 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

156 ms

fastfont.js

fastfont.js

1280 ms

EUCookieDirective.js

EUCookieDirective.js

1281 ms

Logo_-_Dazzax_Domains_Banner.png

Logo_-_Dazzax_Domains_Banner.png

86 ms

parkeddomain.png

parkeddomain.png

85 ms

27fontincrease.png

27fontincrease.png

85 ms

27fontreset.png

27fontreset.png

86 ms

27fontdecrease.png

27fontdecrease.png

155 ms

facebook_log_48.png

facebook_log_48.png

158 ms

twitter_log_48.png

twitter_log_48.png

155 ms

linkedin_log_48.png

linkedin_log_48.png

156 ms

Logo%20-%20PMP.png

Logo%20-%20PMP.png

232 ms

Logo%20-%20AO%202.png

Logo%20-%20AO%202.png

233 ms

info_icon.png

info_icon.png

234 ms

27none.png

27none.png

154 ms

waffle.png

waffle.png

230 ms

continue_button.png

continue_button.png

230 ms

SofiaProLight-webfont.woff

SofiaProLight-webfont.woff

227 ms

Accessibility Review

jumpjump.net accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

jumpjump.net best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

jumpjump.net SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jumpjump.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Jumpjump.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

jumpjump.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Jumpjump. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: