Tools & Wizards About Us
junecloud.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 76

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    84% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 87% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    95% of websites

junecloud.com

Junecloud

Page Load Speed

963 ms in total

First Response

146 ms

Resources Loaded

629 ms

Page Rendered

188 ms

junecloud.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to junecloud.com homepage info - get ready to check Junecloud best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about junecloud.com

We make software for iPhone, iPad, Mac, and Web.

Visit junecloud.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Junecloud.com page load time and found that the first response time was 146 ms and then it took 817 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

junecloud.com performance score

76

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

68/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.4 s

20/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.5 s

98/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value10 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.5 s

98/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

junecloud.com

146 ms

plain-v4.css

42 ms

screen-v4.css

82 ms

styles.css

79 ms

ios-v4.css

79 ms

Our browser made a total of 30 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (28 requests) were addressed to the original Junecloud.com, 7% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (183 ms) belongs to the original domain Junecloud.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 129.8 kB (38%)

Content Size

341.8 kB

After Optimization

212.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Junecloud.com main page is 341.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 155.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 6.9 kB

  • Original 10.1 kB
  • After minification 9.9 kB
  • After compression 3.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 6.9 kB or 69% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 143.7 kB
  • After minification 143.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Junecloud images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-63%

Potential reduce by 97.8 kB

  • Original 155.7 kB
  • After minification 149.0 kB
  • After compression 58.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 97.8 kB or 63% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 25.1 kB

  • Original 32.3 kB
  • After minification 24.2 kB
  • After compression 7.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Junecloud.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 25.1 kB or 78% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (43%)

Requests Now

28

After Optimization

16

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 28 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Junecloud. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

junecloud.com

junecloud.com

146 ms

plain-v4.css

plain-v4.css

42 ms

screen-v4.css

screen-v4.css

82 ms

styles.css

styles.css

79 ms

ios-v4.css

ios-v4.css

79 ms

mootools.js

mootools.js

164 ms

view.js

view.js

85 ms

common-v4.js

common-v4.js

83 ms

stylesheet.css

stylesheet.css

76 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

77 ms

common.js

common.js

75 ms

ga.js

ga.js

30 ms

clouds.png

clouds.png

77 ms

junecloud.png

junecloud.png

66 ms

nav.png

nav.png

64 ms

search.png

search.png

64 ms

go.png

go.png

70 ms

deliveries-7-hero.png

deliveries-7-hero.png

183 ms

app-store.svg

app-store.svg

78 ms

mac-app-store.svg

mac-app-store.svg

82 ms

20160216_7232.jpg

20160216_7232.jpg

85 ms

20150901_8623.jpg

20150901_8623.jpg

105 ms

20160216_8828.jpg

20160216_8828.jpg

115 ms

20150901_8746.jpg

20150901_8746.jpg

117 ms

social.png

social.png

118 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

12 ms

volkswagen-serial-bold.woff

volkswagen-serial-bold.woff

97 ms

explorer.css

explorer.css

82 ms

print-v4.css

print-v4.css

42 ms

mobile-v4.css

mobile-v4.css

41 ms

Accessibility Review

junecloud.com accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

junecloud.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

junecloud.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Junecloud.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Junecloud.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

junecloud.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Junecloud. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: