3.6 sec in total
57 ms
3.2 sec
289 ms
Click here to check amazing Junk Removal content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about junkremoval.com
Serious offers only.
Visit junkremoval.comWe analyzed Junkremoval.com page load time and found that the first response time was 57 ms and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
junkremoval.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.8 s
28/100
10%
Value4.6 s
35/100
25%
Value12.0 s
4/100
10%
Value1,110 ms
23/100
30%
Value0.135
80/100
15%
Value11.9 s
17/100
10%
57 ms
2571 ms
106 ms
18 ms
31 ms
Our browser made a total of 89 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Junkremoval.com, 83% (74 requests) were made to Ubbi.com and 10% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.6 sec) relates to the external source Ubbi.com.
Page size can be reduced by 205.0 kB (17%)
1.2 MB
1.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Junkremoval.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 691.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 81.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 81.4 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 22.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Junk Removal needs image optimization as it can save up to 22.1 kB or 16% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 48.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 52.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Junkremoval.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 52.7 kB or 18% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 69 (91%)
76
7
The browser has sent 76 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Junk Removal. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 39 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
junkremoval.com
57 ms
2571 ms
js
106 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
18 ms
frontend.min.css
31 ms
swiper.min.css
47 ms
post-39.css
43 ms
frontend.min.css
46 ms
global.css
39 ms
post-1936.css
43 ms
post-3912.css
40 ms
post-4476.css
66 ms
post-5294.css
64 ms
css
96 ms
main.min.css
67 ms
custom-scrollbar.min.css
65 ms
wpbakery.min.css
62 ms
post-type.min.css
83 ms
css-vars.css
92 ms
custom.css
95 ms
media.css
85 ms
mega-menu.css
89 ms
the7-elements-albums-portfolio.css
92 ms
post-type-dynamic.css
108 ms
style.css
117 ms
elementor-global.min.css
109 ms
the7-icon-box-grid-widget.min.css
113 ms
the7-horizontal-menu-widget.min.css
111 ms
the7-icon-widget.min.css
113 ms
the7-vertical-menu-widget.min.css
114 ms
the7-carousel-widget.min.css
145 ms
the7-carousel-navigation.min.css
147 ms
css
115 ms
fontawesome.min.css
147 ms
solid.min.css
143 ms
brands.min.css
145 ms
jquery.min.js
168 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
163 ms
frontend-gtag.min.js
163 ms
above-the-fold.min.js
164 ms
api.js
161 ms
post-6349.css
155 ms
the7-search-form-widget.min.css
159 ms
post-6362.css
140 ms
animations.min.css
136 ms
the7-sticky-effects.min.css
208 ms
rs6.css
209 ms
main.min.js
226 ms
rbtools.min.js
209 ms
rs6.min.js
210 ms
jquery-mousewheel.min.js
202 ms
custom-scrollbar.min.js
201 ms
post-type.min.js
202 ms
frontend-common.min.js
202 ms
the7-horizontal-menu.min.js
192 ms
the7-vertical-menu.min.js
180 ms
the7-search-form-widget.min.js
178 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
178 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
176 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
177 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
161 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
159 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
159 ms
hooks.min.js
158 ms
i18n.min.js
157 ms
frontend.min.js
157 ms
waypoints.min.js
157 ms
core.min.js
156 ms
frontend.min.js
177 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
178 ms
jquery-sticky.min.js
176 ms
sticky-effects.min.js
162 ms
Color-logo-no-background.png
88 ms
company-logo-dark.svg
85 ms
wave-art-bg-white-down.svg
87 ms
3.png
90 ms
Color-logo-no-background.png
88 ms
recaptcha__en.js
147 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
42 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEA.ttf
74 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf
75 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEA.ttf
99 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_Z1xlEA.ttf
115 ms
pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTucHtF.ttf
118 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf
116 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf
118 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1xlEA.ttf
117 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5Z1xlEA.ttf
118 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
60 ms
junkremoval.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
junkremoval.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
junkremoval.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Junkremoval.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Junkremoval.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
junkremoval.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Junk Removal. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: