845 ms in total
13 ms
733 ms
99 ms
Visit jupiterpay.com now to see the best up-to-date Jupiter Pay content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about jupiterpay.com
Visit jupiterpay.comWe analyzed Jupiterpay.com page load time and found that the first response time was 13 ms and then it took 832 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster. This domain responded with an error, which can significantly jeopardize Jupiterpay.com rating and web reputation
jupiterpay.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.4 s
38/100
10%
Value5.1 s
25/100
25%
Value3.5 s
87/100
10%
Value170 ms
93/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value4.8 s
79/100
10%
13 ms
6 ms
10 ms
22 ms
13 ms
Our browser made a total of 13 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Jupiterpay.com, 8% (1 request) were made to Lptag.liveperson.net and 8% (1 request) were made to Tags.liveperson.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (207 ms) relates to the external source Tags.liveperson.net.
Page size can be reduced by 405.8 kB (53%)
765.6 kB
359.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Jupiterpay.com main page is 765.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 455.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 9.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 9.0 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 31.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Jupiter Pay needs image optimization as it can save up to 31.9 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 364.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 364.9 kB or 80% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (30%)
10
7
The browser has sent 10 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jupiter Pay. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
Login.cfm
13 ms
cfform.js
6 ms
masks.js
10 ms
jquery-latest.js
22 ms
mainScript.js
13 ms
ipBG.jpg
33 ms
loginbtn.png
7 ms
ipText1.png
21 ms
ipText2.png
163 ms
ipText3.png
12 ms
ipText4.png
19 ms
tag.js
135 ms
.jsonp
207 ms
jupiterpay.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
jupiterpay.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
jupiterpay.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jupiterpay.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Jupiterpay.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
jupiterpay.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Jupiter Pay. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: