2.9 sec in total
692 ms
1.8 sec
341 ms
Welcome to jupiterscreenrepair.com homepage info - get ready to check Jupiter Screen Repair best content right away, or after learning these important things about jupiterscreenrepair.com
Dino and his family own and operate a traditional family business, with traditional work ethics and values! A second-generation screen expert, Adam has take ...
Visit jupiterscreenrepair.comWe analyzed Jupiterscreenrepair.com page load time and found that the first response time was 692 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
jupiterscreenrepair.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.0 s
49/100
10%
Value6.7 s
8/100
25%
Value8.2 s
20/100
10%
Value330 ms
75/100
30%
Value0.029
100/100
15%
Value9.8 s
28/100
10%
692 ms
28 ms
53 ms
80 ms
80 ms
Our browser made a total of 83 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Jupiterscreenrepair.com, 37% (31 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (692 ms) relates to the external source Jupitertequestascreen.com.
Page size can be reduced by 209.4 kB (18%)
1.1 MB
933.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Jupiterscreenrepair.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 599.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 51.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 51.3 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Jupiter Screen Repair images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 27.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 131.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jupiterscreenrepair.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 131.1 kB or 67% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 44 (88%)
50
6
The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jupiter Screen Repair. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
jupitertequestascreen.com
692 ms
formidableforms.css
28 ms
style.min.css
53 ms
theme.min.css
80 ms
header-footer.min.css
80 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
81 ms
post-403.css
85 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
86 ms
swiper.min.css
86 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
105 ms
global.css
106 ms
post-433.css
105 ms
post-594.css
111 ms
post-707.css
114 ms
post-781.css
113 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.css
130 ms
css
29 ms
fontawesome.min.css
131 ms
solid.min.css
134 ms
jquery.min.js
168 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
141 ms
widget-nav-menu.min.css
142 ms
widget-icon-box.min.css
155 ms
animations.min.css
154 ms
hello-frontend.min.js
155 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.js
193 ms
jquery.easing.min.js
192 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
195 ms
jquery.smartmenus.min.js
196 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
197 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
199 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
227 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
199 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
203 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
237 ms
hooks.min.js
207 ms
i18n.min.js
229 ms
frontend.min.js
229 ms
waypoints.min.js
207 ms
core.min.js
187 ms
frontend.min.js
213 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
212 ms
underscore.min.js
207 ms
wp-util.min.js
212 ms
frontend.min.js
211 ms
analytics.js
20 ms
jupiter-white-450px.png
105 ms
screenrepari-scaled.jpg
219 ms
218 ms
embed
392 ms
kJEnBuEW6A0lliaV_m88ja5Twtx8BWhtkDVmjZvMGYPZA81b.woff
27 ms
kJEnBuEW6A0lliaV_m88ja5Twtx8BWhtkDVmjZvMfoPZA81b.woff
29 ms
kJEnBuEW6A0lliaV_m88ja5Twtx8BWhtkDVmjZvMV4PZA81b.woff
58 ms
kJEnBuEW6A0lliaV_m88ja5Twtx8BWhtkDVmjZvMIIPZA81b.woff
29 ms
kJEnBuEW6A0lliaV_m88ja5Twtx8BWhtkDVmjZvMzITZA81b.woff
195 ms
kJEnBuEW6A0lliaV_m88ja5Twtx8BWhtkDVmjZvM_oTZA81b.woff
30 ms
kJEnBuEW6A0lliaV_m88ja5Twtx8BWhtkDVmjZvMoITZA81b.woff
38 ms
kJEnBuEW6A0lliaV_m88ja5Twtx8BWhtkDVmjZvMfoTZA81b.woff
82 ms
kJEnBuEW6A0lliaV_m88ja5Twtx8BWhtkDVmjZvM_oXZA81b.woff
85 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
115 ms
qkBIXvYC6trAT55ZBi1ueQVIjQTD-JqaE0lM.woff
38 ms
qkBIXvYC6trAT55ZBi1ueQVIjQTDypqaE0lM.woff
39 ms
qkBIXvYC6trAT55ZBi1ueQVIjQTDppqaE0lM.woff
39 ms
qkBIXvYC6trAT55ZBi1ueQVIjQTDeJqaE0lM.woff
41 ms
qkBIXvYC6trAT55ZBi1ueQVIjQTDJp2aE0lM.woff
42 ms
qkBIXvYC6trAT55ZBi1ueQVIjQTDH52aE0lM.woff
42 ms
qkBIXvYC6trAT55ZBi1ueQVIjQTDeJ2aE0lM.woff
54 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1xZosUZiYw.woff
53 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1y9osUZiYw.woff
54 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs18NvsUZiYw.woff
54 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1_FvsUZiYw.woff
54 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs169vsUZiYw.woff
55 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs13FvsUZiYw.woff
56 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aXw.woff
59 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aXw.woff
58 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aXw.woff
59 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw5aXw.woff
60 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw5aXw.woff
60 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aXw.woff
61 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aXw.woff
77 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w5aXw.woff
78 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w5aXw.woff
77 ms
js
48 ms
jupiterscreenrepair.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
jupiterscreenrepair.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
jupiterscreenrepair.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jupiterscreenrepair.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Jupiterscreenrepair.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
jupiterscreenrepair.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Jupiter Screen Repair. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: