3.7 sec in total
173 ms
1.7 sec
1.8 sec
Click here to check amazing Pvl Joomexp content for Turkey. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about pvl.joomexp.com
And that’s what we’re here to discuss; the pros and cons of WordPress vs. Joomla so you can decide which one is better for your next website.
Visit pvl.joomexp.comWe analyzed Pvl.joomexp.com page load time and found that the first response time was 173 ms and then it took 3.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
pvl.joomexp.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.1 s
80/100
10%
Value4.7 s
32/100
25%
Value2.6 s
97/100
10%
Value280 ms
81/100
30%
Value0.097
90/100
15%
Value8.1 s
41/100
10%
173 ms
161 ms
73 ms
99 ms
25 ms
Our browser made a total of 66 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Pvl.joomexp.com, 67% (44 requests) were made to Easywp.com and 6% (4 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (657 ms) relates to the external source Easywp.com.
Page size can be reduced by 124.8 kB (12%)
1.1 MB
930.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Pvl.joomexp.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 875.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 51.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 51.6 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 58.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Pvl Joomexp images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 14.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 14.5 kB or 16% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 68 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Pvl.joomexp.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (42%)
55
32
The browser has sent 55 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pvl Joomexp. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
pvl.joomexp.com
173 ms
161 ms
gtm.js
73 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
99 ms
style.min.css
25 ms
style.css
34 ms
jquery.min.js
66 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
41 ms
comment_count.js
84 ms
comment-reply.min.js
360 ms
index.js
57 ms
logo-easywp-tm.svg
36 ms
search.svg
38 ms
hamburger.svg
34 ms
EasyWP-wp-vs-joomla-1-cover.png
39 ms
isobel.png
34 ms
EasyWP-wp-vs-joomla-2-cost-to-run-1.png
37 ms
wordpress-vs-joomla-comparison-5.png
43 ms
wordpress-vs-joomla-infographics.png
57 ms
wordpress-vs-joomla-comparison-2.png
75 ms
wordpress-vs-joomla-comparison-3.png
58 ms
wordpress-vs-joomla-comparison-4-1024x577.png
67 ms
wordpress-vs-joomla-comparison-7.png
59 ms
wordpress-vs-joomla-comparison-6-1024x770.png
193 ms
wordpress-vs-joomla-comparison-1-1024x574.png
187 ms
EasyWP-wp-vs-joomla-3-what-cms-do-1.png
184 ms
EasyWP-wp-vs-joomla-4-how-get-help-1.png
184 ms
twitter.svg
195 ms
facebook.svg
227 ms
linkedin.svg
224 ms
EasyWP-website-cost-1-cover.png
227 ms
karol.png
224 ms
cover-wordpress-vs-weebly@2x.png
657 ms
erin.png
290 ms
product-detail@3x.svg
291 ms
analytics.js
60 ms
5670.js
167 ms
hotjar-683063.js
280 ms
quant.js
170 ms
fbevents.js
168 ms
count.js
191 ms
collect
20 ms
collect
69 ms
collect
115 ms
collect
43 ms
Intelo-Semibold.woff
117 ms
Intelo-Bold.woff
54 ms
Intelo-Regular.woff
119 ms
Intelo-Light.woff
120 ms
Intelo-Alt-ExtraBold.woff
123 ms
Intelo-Italic.woff
121 ms
Intelo-LightItalic.woff
124 ms
Intelo-SemiboldItalic.woff
128 ms
Intelo-BoldItalic.woff
127 ms
www.easywp.com.json
43 ms
509700933177832
88 ms
rules-p-ybgCwuafUBAFb.js
78 ms
a18bb0e21d11a839b7adb013c92ee611.js
68 ms
ga-audiences
141 ms
pixel;r=1461222928;labels=keywords.wordpress%2Ckeywords.wordpress%20hosting%2Ckeywords.managed%20wordpress%20hosting%2Ctitle.WordPress%20vs%20%20Joomla%3A%20which%20is%20better%3F%20-%20EasyWP%2Ctitle.WordPress%20vs%20%20Joomla%3A%20which%20is%20better%3F%2Cauthor.Isobel%20Weston%2Cauthor.Namecheap;source=gtm;rf=0;a=p-ybgCwuafUBAFb;url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.easywp.com%2Fblog%2Fwordpress-vs-joomla%2F;uht=2;fpan=1;fpa=P0-415359597-1664457780533;pbc=;ns=0;ce=1;qjs=1;qv=d18171e5-20220913105912;cm=;gdpr=0;ref=;d=easywp.com;dst=0;et=1664457780533;tzo=-180;ogl=locale.en_US%2Ctype.article%2Ctitle.WordPress%20vs%252E%20Joomla%3A%20which%20is%20better%3F%20-%20EasyWP%2Cdescription.WordPress%20and%20Joomla%20are%20both%20open-source%252C%20which%20means%20the%20software%20is%20free%252C%20but%2Curl.https%3A%2F%2Fwww%252Eeasywp%252Ecom%2Fblog%2Fwordpress-vs-joomla%2F%2Csite_name.Managed%20WordPress%20Hosting%20-%20Publish%20in%20Minutes%20-%20EasyWP%2Cimage.https%3A%2F%2Fwww%252Eeasywp%252Ecom%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2021%2F03%2FEasyWP-wp-vs-joomla-3-what-cms%2Cimage%3Awidth.800%2Cimage%3Aheight.433%2Cimage%3Atype.image%2Fpng;ses=a3206896-1a2f-4569-8dff-cf8d87218ef3
90 ms
modules.8203b45d0468dcab4b64.js
57 ms
www.easywp.com.json
40 ms
logo-easywp-octopus.svg
39 ms
logo-namecheap.svg
43 ms
box-69edcc3187336f9b0a3fbb4c73be9fe6.html
19 ms
collect
5 ms
pvl.joomexp.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
pvl.joomexp.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
pvl.joomexp.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pvl.joomexp.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Pvl.joomexp.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
pvl.joomexp.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Pvl Joomexp. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: