6.6 sec in total
1.5 sec
4 sec
1.1 sec
Visit waterworks.jugem.cc now to see the best up-to-date Waterworks Jugem content for Japan and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about waterworks.jugem.cc
underwaterとその周辺について、だらだらと。
Visit waterworks.jugem.ccWe analyzed Waterworks.jugem.cc page load time and found that the first response time was 1.5 sec and then it took 5.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
waterworks.jugem.cc performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.0 s
84/100
10%
Value2.6 s
88/100
25%
Value3.7 s
85/100
10%
Value390 ms
69/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value11.6 s
18/100
10%
1512 ms
471 ms
353 ms
9 ms
44 ms
Our browser made a total of 111 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (4 requests) were addressed to the original Waterworks.jugem.cc, 18% (20 requests) were made to Ecx.images-amazon.com and 11% (12 requests) were made to Img.dlsite.jp. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Waterworks.jugem.cc.
Page size can be reduced by 360.8 kB (26%)
1.4 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Waterworks.jugem.cc main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 947.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 104.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 104.2 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 23.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Waterworks Jugem images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 219.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 219.3 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 14.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Waterworks.jugem.cc needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 14.2 kB or 79% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 48 (46%)
104
56
The browser has sent 104 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Waterworks Jugem. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
waterworks.jugem.cc
1512 ms
jm_style.css
471 ms
cookie.js
353 ms
cookie.js
9 ms
analytics.js
44 ms
20070703_385146.jpg
790 ms
51Xxbz%2Bs90L.jpg
46 ms
icn_morereview.gif
38 ms
20070321_337712.gif
47 ms
stars_40.gif
37 ms
stars_50.gif
40 ms
51amOdYA23L.jpg
43 ms
513P5P8Z7WL.jpg
37 ms
51Vj%2BqwMFvL.jpg
40 ms
51QdFM9ql0L.jpg
43 ms
51scRCsSBxL.jpg
41 ms
51NtiGl1imL.jpg
44 ms
61PGJn%2BV0iL.jpg
47 ms
51kj7ZpmokL.jpg
45 ms
514i%2B2CP8JL.jpg
46 ms
51FbqTi7hnL.jpg
44 ms
61NLkLSH-bL.jpg
45 ms
blank.gif
201 ms
jg_ads_init_display.js
28 ms
collect
26 ms
jg_ads_display.js
5 ms
show_ads.js
6 ms
show_ads_impl.js
47 ms
collect
156 ms
ads
400 ms
osd.js
75 ms
jg_ads_init_bottom_entry.js
24 ms
jg_ads_bottom_entry.js
25 ms
RJ079897_img_sam.jpg
92 ms
q
235 ms
aqua.js
516 ms
i.php
241 ms
02-2_copy.js
520 ms
AdLantisLoader.js
688 ms
15.jpg
523 ms
RJ086553_img_sam.jpg
105 ms
RJ087756_img_sam.jpg
106 ms
RJ077414_img_sam.jpg
89 ms
RJ085261_img_sam.jpg
89 ms
RJ086319_img_sam.jpg
68 ms
RJ062092_img_sam.jpg
304 ms
RJ017380_img_sam.jpg
104 ms
RJ083262_img_sam.jpg
89 ms
RJ028888_img_sam.jpg
98 ms
RJ023840_img_sam.jpg
112 ms
RJ016394_img_sam.jpg
107 ms
blank.gif
41 ms
ads
284 ms
sdk.js
164 ms
8002_6.js
558 ms
108 ms
xd_arbiter.php
175 ms
xd_arbiter.php
293 ms
16455578715576897839
30 ms
abg.js
37 ms
m_js_controller.js
48 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
27 ms
s
39 ms
x_button_blue2.png
38 ms
favicon
95 ms
nessie_icon_tiamat_white.png
16 ms
Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js
5 ms
popup.js
81 ms
nifty.js
257 ms
colors.js
172 ms
aqua01.html
163 ms
ruri01.gif
157 ms
kakureb01.gif
312 ms
rurib01.gif
316 ms
kakure01.gif
319 ms
oya01.gif
334 ms
waterworks0e-22
746 ms
adlantis.www.js
175 ms
swfobject.js
329 ms
style.css
179 ms
geobp.js
876 ms
aqua01.jpg
320 ms
load_script
348 ms
a75869f2bec919121cee72bed286150c2eccce04.png
656 ms
niftyCorners-1._V45728744_.css
18 ms
nifty-1._V45728692_.js
14 ms
btn_cart2._V158153839_.png
25 ms
31E06VZBMNL._SL125_.jpg
23 ms
no-image-no-ciu._SL125_V156249166_.gif
17 ms
go-orange-trans._V192555739_.gif
19 ms
powered-by-amazon-b._V158154128_.png
19 ms
315QSAGAB0L._SL125_.jpg
14 ms
21KWZX4QHVL._SL125_.jpg
20 ms
211JJA1NRGL._SL125_.jpg
16 ms
31CNYZEB7AL._SL125_.jpg
17 ms
21VQYVN8NZL._SL125_.jpg
15 ms
2167C7T0ZTL._SL125_.jpg
17 ms
niftyPrint-1._V45727998_.css
9 ms
ga.js
11 ms
__utm.gif
24 ms
ir
202 ms
173 ms
widgets.css
81 ms
q
103 ms
ui
29 ms
ddwn_tpng.png
84 ms
51rM%2B7AfvOL._SL75_.jpg
52 ms
collect
13 ms
amazon-logo-b_tpng.png
96 ms
go-rd-sec_tpng.png
164 ms
bg4_tpng.png
135 ms
waterworks.jugem.cc accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
<input type="image"> elements do not have [alt] text
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
waterworks.jugem.cc best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
waterworks.jugem.cc SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
JA
JA
EUC-JP
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Waterworks.jugem.cc can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Japanese is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Waterworks.jugem.cc main page’s claimed encoding is euc-jp. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
waterworks.jugem.cc
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Waterworks Jugem. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: