Tools & Wizards About Us
ww7.joomexp.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 62

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    77% of other websites

  • 97

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 92% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 99

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    93% of websites

ww7.joomexp.com

WordPress vs. Joomla: which is better? - EasyWP

Page Load Speed

4.9 sec in total

First Response

61 ms

Resources Loaded

3.5 sec

Page Rendered

1.4 sec

ww7.joomexp.com screenshot

About Website

Visit ww7.joomexp.com now to see the best up-to-date Ww 7 Joomexp content for Turkey and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ww7.joomexp.com

And that’s what we’re here to discuss; the pros and cons of WordPress vs. Joomla so you can decide which one is better for your next website.

Visit ww7.joomexp.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Ww7.joomexp.com page load time and found that the first response time was 61 ms and then it took 4.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ww7.joomexp.com performance score

62

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.1 s

82/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

71/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.8 s

96/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value870 ms

33/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.106

88/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.1 s

33/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ww7.joomexp.com

61 ms

383 ms

gtm.js

82 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

365 ms

style.min.css

22 ms

Our browser made a total of 79 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Ww7.joomexp.com, 57% (45 requests) were made to Easywp.com and 10% (8 requests) were made to Youtube.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) relates to the external source Easywp.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 244.0 kB (18%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Ww7.joomexp.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 874.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 53.9 kB

  • Original 71.5 kB
  • After minification 69.3 kB
  • After compression 17.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 53.9 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-20%

Potential reduce by 172.2 kB

  • Original 874.5 kB
  • After minification 702.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Ww 7 Joomexp needs image optimization as it can save up to 172.2 kB or 20% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 17.9 kB

  • Original 361.7 kB
  • After minification 361.7 kB
  • After compression 343.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 90 B

  • Original 81.6 kB
  • After minification 81.6 kB
  • After compression 81.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ww7.joomexp.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (38%)

Requests Now

65

After Optimization

40

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 65 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ww 7 Joomexp. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

ww7.joomexp.com

ww7.joomexp.com

61 ms

383 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

82 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

365 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

22 ms

classic-themes.min.css

classic-themes.min.css

20 ms

style.css

style.css

268 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

30 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

28 ms

comment_count.js

comment_count.js

10 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

324 ms

index.js

index.js

9 ms

js

js

57 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

30 ms

5670.js

5670.js

50 ms

hotjar-683063.js

hotjar-683063.js

102 ms

quant.js

quant.js

74 ms

collect

collect

38 ms

collect

collect

51 ms

collect

collect

36 ms

collect

collect

57 ms

collect

collect

45 ms

www.easywp.com.json

www.easywp.com.json

15 ms

84a07e3a698688683d493761c9786bde.js

84a07e3a698688683d493761c9786bde.js

14 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

29 ms

modules.a4fd7e5489291affcf56.js

modules.a4fd7e5489291affcf56.js

19 ms

3bXu4MRiJGk

3bXu4MRiJGk

100 ms

logo-easywp-tm.svg

logo-easywp-tm.svg

87 ms

search.svg

search.svg

83 ms

hamburger.svg

hamburger.svg

85 ms

EasyWP-wp-vs-joomla-1-cover.png

EasyWP-wp-vs-joomla-1-cover.png

566 ms

isobel.png

isobel.png

85 ms

EasyWP-wp-vs-joomla-2-cost-to-run-1.png

EasyWP-wp-vs-joomla-2-cost-to-run-1.png

566 ms

wordpress-vs-joomla-comparison-5.png

wordpress-vs-joomla-comparison-5.png

583 ms

wordpress-vs-joomla-infographics.png

wordpress-vs-joomla-infographics.png

584 ms

wordpress-vs-joomla-comparison-2.png

wordpress-vs-joomla-comparison-2.png

567 ms

wordpress-vs-joomla-comparison-3.png

wordpress-vs-joomla-comparison-3.png

566 ms

wordpress-vs-joomla-comparison-4-1024x577.png

wordpress-vs-joomla-comparison-4-1024x577.png

770 ms

wordpress-vs-joomla-comparison-7.png

wordpress-vs-joomla-comparison-7.png

936 ms

wordpress-vs-joomla-comparison-6-1024x770.png

wordpress-vs-joomla-comparison-6-1024x770.png

1001 ms

wordpress-vs-joomla-comparison-1-1024x574.png

wordpress-vs-joomla-comparison-1-1024x574.png

939 ms

EasyWP-wp-vs-joomla-3-what-cms-do-1.png

EasyWP-wp-vs-joomla-3-what-cms-do-1.png

948 ms

EasyWP-wp-vs-joomla-4-how-get-help-1.png

EasyWP-wp-vs-joomla-4-how-get-help-1.png

939 ms

twitter.svg

twitter.svg

934 ms

facebook.svg

facebook.svg

936 ms

linkedin.svg

linkedin.svg

1052 ms

EasyWP-13-elements-landing-page-1-cover.png

EasyWP-13-elements-landing-page-1-cover.png

1160 ms

sbalkhi.png

sbalkhi.png

1104 ms

EasyWP-customers-world-radio-1-cover.png

EasyWP-customers-world-radio-1-cover.png

1264 ms

richardk.png

richardk.png

956 ms

product-detail@3x.svg

product-detail@3x.svg

969 ms

count.js

count.js

64 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

31 ms

Intelo-Semibold.woff

Intelo-Semibold.woff

1320 ms

Intelo-Bold.woff

Intelo-Bold.woff

1384 ms

Intelo-Regular.woff

Intelo-Regular.woff

1439 ms

Intelo-Light.woff

Intelo-Light.woff

1425 ms

Intelo-Alt-ExtraBold.woff

Intelo-Alt-ExtraBold.woff

1489 ms

Intelo-Italic.woff

Intelo-Italic.woff

1593 ms

Intelo-LightItalic.woff

Intelo-LightItalic.woff

1705 ms

Intelo-SemiboldItalic.woff

Intelo-SemiboldItalic.woff

1784 ms

Intelo-BoldItalic.woff

Intelo-BoldItalic.woff

1783 ms

logo-easywp-octopus.svg

logo-easywp-octopus.svg

1736 ms

logo-namecheap.svg

logo-namecheap.svg

1737 ms

iframe_api

iframe_api

60 ms

3bXu4MRiJGk

3bXu4MRiJGk

112 ms

www-widgetapi.js

www-widgetapi.js

8 ms

www-player.css

www-player.css

7 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

25 ms

base.js

base.js

53 ms

ad_status.js

ad_status.js

175 ms

6mt_jkCC8QEMfVv4UaXe0WVRezbgElH9_VSMBGBwk28.js

6mt_jkCC8QEMfVv4UaXe0WVRezbgElH9_VSMBGBwk28.js

92 ms

embed.js

embed.js

41 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

157 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

158 ms

id

id

146 ms

Create

Create

149 ms

GenerateIT

GenerateIT

16 ms

collect

collect

5 ms

Accessibility Review

ww7.joomexp.com accessibility score

97

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

ww7.joomexp.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

ww7.joomexp.com SEO score

99

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ww7.joomexp.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ww7.joomexp.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

ww7.joomexp.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Ww 7 Joomexp. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: