Tools & Wizards About Us
kinderloop.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 65

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    78% of other websites

  • 73

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 38% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 80

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    42% of websites

kinderloop.com

Early Childhood reporting/EYLF documentation made simple, connecting childcare providers, educators & teachers with family, Kinderloop

Page Load Speed

888 ms in total

First Response

30 ms

Resources Loaded

629 ms

Page Rendered

229 ms

kinderloop.com screenshot

About Website

Visit kinderloop.com now to see the best up-to-date Kinderloop content for Australia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about kinderloop.com

Childcare reporting, Early Childhood Documentation, Care Provider, Teacher, Learning Journey, Parent communication, EYLF, EYLS, NAYCE, EY Reporting

Visit kinderloop.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Kinderloop.com page load time and found that the first response time was 30 ms and then it took 858 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

kinderloop.com performance score

65

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

55/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

80/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.8 s

84/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value640 ms

46/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.097

90/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.6 s

37/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

kinderloop.com

30 ms

kinderloop.com

31 ms

keen-2.1.0-min.js

134 ms

require.js

28 ms

jquery.min.js

54 ms

Our browser made a total of 37 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 68% of them (25 requests) were addressed to the original Kinderloop.com, 8% (3 requests) were made to Ssl.google-analytics.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to S3.amazonaws.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (331 ms) relates to the external source Vimeo.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 77.9 kB (5%)

Content Size

1.7 MB

After Optimization

1.6 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Kinderloop.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 20.7 kB

  • Original 27.5 kB
  • After minification 20.9 kB
  • After compression 6.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.5 kB, which is 24% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 20.7 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 57.0 kB

  • Original 1.6 MB
  • After minification 1.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Kinderloop images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 92 B

  • Original 57.3 kB
  • After minification 57.3 kB
  • After compression 57.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 29 B

  • Original 1.4 kB
  • After minification 1.4 kB
  • After compression 1.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Kinderloop.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (45%)

Requests Now

33

After Optimization

18

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 33 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Kinderloop. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

kinderloop.com

kinderloop.com

30 ms

kinderloop.com

kinderloop.com

31 ms

keen-2.1.0-min.js

keen-2.1.0-min.js

134 ms

require.js

require.js

28 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

54 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

42 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

42 ms

bootstrap.js

bootstrap.js

42 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

51 ms

kinderloop.css

kinderloop.css

42 ms

site.css

site.css

51 ms

js

js

133 ms

287741439.js

287741439.js

95 ms

freshwidget.js

freshwidget.js

134 ms

element.js

element.js

134 ms

metrics.js

metrics.js

43 ms

ga.js

ga.js

54 ms

freshwidget.css

freshwidget.css

38 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

21 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

75 ms

logo-34h.png

logo-34h.png

65 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

57 ms

videos.json

videos.json

331 ms

hero.jpg

hero.jpg

59 ms

screen-web-ipad.jpg

screen-web-ipad.jpg

58 ms

screen-secure.jpg

screen-secure.jpg

56 ms

screen-phone.jpg

screen-phone.jpg

52 ms

testimonial-bfs.jpg

testimonial-bfs.jpg

50 ms

testimonial-glenyse.jpg

testimonial-glenyse.jpg

58 ms

testimonial-hills.jpg

testimonial-hills.jpg

56 ms

testimonial-grandma.jpg

testimonial-grandma.jpg

57 ms

testimonial-nelson.jpg

testimonial-nelson.jpg

68 ms

testimonial-nextkids.jpg

testimonial-nextkids.jpg

75 ms

testimonial-tafe.jpg

testimonial-tafe.jpg

83 ms

applestore_button.png

applestore_button.png

66 ms

aandroidstore_button.png

aandroidstore_button.png

77 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

74 ms

Accessibility Review

kinderloop.com accessibility score

73

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

kinderloop.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

kinderloop.com SEO score

80

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Kinderloop.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Kinderloop.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

kinderloop.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Kinderloop. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: