4.7 sec in total
32 ms
4.4 sec
189 ms
Visit kingbishop.com now to see the best up-to-date King Bishop content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about kingbishop.com
How can we work for you? Founded in 1983, King & Bishop, located just outside of Boston, has placed thousands of professionals throughout North America for companies just like yours. Our core practice...
Visit kingbishop.comWe analyzed Kingbishop.com page load time and found that the first response time was 32 ms and then it took 4.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
kingbishop.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.8 s
0/100
10%
Value11.3 s
0/100
25%
Value10.6 s
7/100
10%
Value580 ms
51/100
30%
Value0.037
100/100
15%
Value15.0 s
8/100
10%
32 ms
751 ms
83 ms
69 ms
23 ms
Our browser made a total of 91 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 59% of them (54 requests) were addressed to the original Kingbishop.com, 4% (4 requests) were made to Cdn.openshareweb.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to Px.owneriq.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Kingbishop.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.0 MB (62%)
1.6 MB
631.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Kingbishop.com main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 560.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 121.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 121.1 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 187.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, King Bishop needs image optimization as it can save up to 187.8 kB or 34% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 277.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 277.1 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 429.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Kingbishop.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 429.2 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 63 (77%)
82
19
The browser has sent 82 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of King Bishop. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 25 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
kingbishop.com
32 ms
www.kingbishop.com
751 ms
62f7cb4993.js
83 ms
shareaholic.js
69 ms
display.css
23 ms
style.min.css
45 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
28 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
31 ms
button.css
38 ms
style.css
49 ms
style.css
44 ms
css
52 ms
font-awesome.min.css
49 ms
nivo-lightbox.css
47 ms
jquery.bxslider.css
48 ms
sequence-slider.css
50 ms
superfish.css
50 ms
TimeCircles.css
52 ms
responsive.css
54 ms
admin_style.min.css
55 ms
style.php
646 ms
wpjb-glyphs.css
58 ms
frontend.css
61 ms
jetpack.css
65 ms
jquery.min.js
65 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
58 ms
display.js
63 ms
frontend.js
67 ms
js
106 ms
css
59 ms
css
67 ms
addthis_widget.js
149 ms
flexslider.css
63 ms
public.css
66 ms
core.min.js
68 ms
datepicker.min.js
99 ms
image-cdn.js
68 ms
plugins.js
103 ms
TimeCircles.js
101 ms
custom.js
104 ms
e-202405.js
37 ms
jquery.flexslider.min.js
115 ms
script.min.js
123 ms
underscore.min.js
141 ms
wp-util.min.js
147 ms
serialize.js
142 ms
frontend-alert.js
1079 ms
fonts.css
1017 ms
polyfills.js
39 ms
analytics.js
203 ms
KB-40-Logo-Color.jpg
218 ms
bgheader.jpg
190 ms
king-and-bishop-logo-1.png
159 ms
find-your-next-hire4-1-2373x500.jpg
208 ms
hear-from-our-clients3-2373x500.jpg
207 ms
talent-management-solution3-2373x500.jpg
208 ms
payroll-service-benefits-2373x500.jpg
207 ms
AOEP.png
210 ms
massstaffing.jpg
216 ms
neba_logo_clear.png
222 ms
SHRM.png
224 ms
SOMA2.jpg
228 ms
main.js
84 ms
arrow.png
179 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
162 ms
bg_direction_nav.png
52 ms
e
48 ms
collect
18 ms
bad2d6fe6f714121ba8a1e57eb92c710.json
20 ms
js
51 ms
buttons.js
9 ms
partners.js
120 ms
shareaholic-icons.woff
23 ms
sholic.js
57 ms
taglw.aspx
46 ms
p
42 ms
afsh.js
59 ms
tpid=8f04b800-efaa-4f34-8ce6-52b3bdac1cfe
12 ms
10 ms
eps
17 ms
p
115 ms
379208.gif
55 ms
1
46 ms
v2
106 ms
apndmp
10 ms
setuid
129 ms
25 ms
1078175103266774468
4 ms
generic
18 ms
generic
4 ms
mapuid
8 ms
kingbishop.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
kingbishop.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
kingbishop.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Kingbishop.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Kingbishop.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
kingbishop.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of King Bishop. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: