Tools & Wizards About Us
kingsiegel.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 32

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    52% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

kingsiegel.com

Los Angeles Employment Attorneys | King & Siegel LLP

Page Load Speed

19.5 sec in total

First Response

230 ms

Resources Loaded

4.1 sec

Page Rendered

15.2 sec

kingsiegel.com screenshot

About Website

Visit kingsiegel.com now to see the best up-to-date King Siegel content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about kingsiegel.com

Top-rated Los Angeles employment attorneys, aggressively fighting for those who have been wronged in the workplace. $60M+ Worth Of Settlements

Visit kingsiegel.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Kingsiegel.com page load time and found that the first response time was 230 ms and then it took 19.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

kingsiegel.com performance score

32

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

57/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.6 s

8/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.1 s

45/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,530 ms

13/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.056

98/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.0 s

13/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

kingsiegel.com

230 ms

www.kingsiegel.com

795 ms

css

567 ms

gtm.js

1073 ms

banner_image.jpg

917 ms

Our browser made a total of 46 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 72% of them (33 requests) were addressed to the original Kingsiegel.com, 22% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Kingsiegel.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 433.5 kB (21%)

Content Size

2.1 MB

After Optimization

1.6 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Kingsiegel.com main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 428.1 kB

  • Original 538.1 kB
  • After minification 522.7 kB
  • After compression 110.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 428.1 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 1.4 MB
  • After minification 1.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. King Siegel images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 5.4 kB

  • Original 137.8 kB
  • After minification 137.8 kB
  • After compression 132.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (70%)

Requests Now

30

After Optimization

9

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 30 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of King Siegel. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

kingsiegel.com

kingsiegel.com

230 ms

www.kingsiegel.com

www.kingsiegel.com

795 ms

css

css

567 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

1073 ms

banner_image.jpg

banner_image.jpg

917 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

730 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

829 ms

postratings-js.js

postratings-js.js

825 ms

smush-lazy-load.min.js

smush-lazy-load.min.js

802 ms

child-main.js

child-main.js

823 ms

dom-ready.min.js

dom-ready.min.js

1000 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

815 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

1007 ms

a11y.min.js

a11y.min.js

1005 ms

jquery.json.min.js

jquery.json.min.js

1004 ms

gravityforms.min.js

gravityforms.min.js

997 ms

jquery.maskedinput.min.js

jquery.maskedinput.min.js

993 ms

placeholders.jquery.min.js

placeholders.jquery.min.js

1518 ms

utils.min.js

utils.min.js

1516 ms

vendor-theme.min.js

vendor-theme.min.js

1550 ms

scripts-theme.min.js

scripts-theme.min.js

1509 ms

akismet-frontend.js

akismet-frontend.js

1503 ms

conditional_logic.min.js

conditional_logic.min.js

1075 ms

lazysizes.min.js

lazysizes.min.js

1644 ms

img_intro_background.jpg

img_intro_background.jpg

1210 ms

img_case_results_background.jpg.webp

img_case_results_background.jpg.webp

1209 ms

img_footer_background.jpg

img_footer_background.jpg

1200 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

518 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX8.ttf

529 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aX8.ttf

1105 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf

1118 ms

E21x_cfngu7HiRpPX3ZpNE4kY5zKSPmJXkF0VDD2RApATI3rvdw.ttf

E21x_cfngu7HiRpPX3ZpNE4kY5zKSPmJXkF0VDD2RApATI3rvdw.ttf

1160 ms

E21x_cfngu7HiRpPX3ZpNE4kY5zKSPmJXkF0VDD2RAp5TI3rvdw.ttf

E21x_cfngu7HiRpPX3ZpNE4kY5zKSPmJXkF0VDD2RAp5TI3rvdw.ttf

1159 ms

E21x_cfngu7HiRpPX3ZpNE4kY5zKSPmJXkF0VDD2RAqnS43rvdw.ttf

E21x_cfngu7HiRpPX3ZpNE4kY5zKSPmJXkF0VDD2RAqnS43rvdw.ttf

1159 ms

2sDPZGJYnIjSi6H75xkZZE1I0yCmYzzQtgFgIGaV2g.ttf

2sDPZGJYnIjSi6H75xkZZE1I0yCmYzzQtgFgIGaV2g.ttf

1156 ms

2sDPZGJYnIjSi6H75xkZZE1I0yCmYzzQtjhgIGaV2g.ttf

2sDPZGJYnIjSi6H75xkZZE1I0yCmYzzQtjhgIGaV2g.ttf

1117 ms

2sDPZGJYnIjSi6H75xkZZE1I0yCmYzzQtuZnIGaV2g.ttf

2sDPZGJYnIjSi6H75xkZZE1I0yCmYzzQtuZnIGaV2g.ttf

1194 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

1713 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

1714 ms

fa-light-300.woff

fa-light-300.woff

1713 ms

rating_over.gif

rating_over.gif

1291 ms

Logo.png

Logo.png

1291 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

965 ms

chat.min.js

chat.min.js

864 ms

picturefill.min.js

picturefill.min.js

643 ms

banner_image.png

banner_image.png

302 ms

Accessibility Review

kingsiegel.com accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

kingsiegel.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

kingsiegel.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Kingsiegel.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Kingsiegel.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

kingsiegel.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of King Siegel. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: