Tools & Wizards About Us
kingstar.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 96

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    94% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 66% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

kingstar.com

KINGSTAR Software for Real-Time Industrial Control Systems

Page Load Speed

1.1 sec in total

First Response

120 ms

Resources Loaded

659 ms

Page Rendered

284 ms

kingstar.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing KINGSTAR content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about kingstar.com

PC-Based Software Platforms for Building Real-Time Industrial Control Systems

Visit kingstar.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Kingstar.com page load time and found that the first response time was 120 ms and then it took 943 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

kingstar.com performance score

96

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.0 s

83/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.2 s

95/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.0 s

99/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.086

93/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.1 s

99/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

kingstar.com

120 ms

kingstar.com

151 ms

css

67 ms

front.min.css

40 ms

video-container.min.css

41 ms

Our browser made a total of 45 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 24% of them (11 requests) were addressed to the original Kingstar.com, 49% (22 requests) were made to Kingstar.wpengine.com and 24% (11 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (308 ms) relates to the external source Kingstar.wpengine.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 168.4 kB (26%)

Content Size

656.5 kB

After Optimization

488.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Kingstar.com main page is 656.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 439.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 155.0 kB

  • Original 191.7 kB
  • After minification 188.5 kB
  • After compression 36.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 155.0 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 13.4 kB

  • Original 439.0 kB
  • After minification 425.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. KINGSTAR images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 5 B

  • Original 3.1 kB
  • After minification 3.1 kB
  • After compression 3.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 79 B

  • Original 22.7 kB
  • After minification 22.7 kB
  • After compression 22.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Kingstar.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 6 (19%)

Requests Now

31

After Optimization

25

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 31 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of KINGSTAR. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

kingstar.com

kingstar.com

120 ms

kingstar.com

kingstar.com

151 ms

css

css

67 ms

front.min.css

front.min.css

40 ms

video-container.min.css

video-container.min.css

41 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

59 ms

choices.min.css

choices.min.css

60 ms

style.css

style.css

62 ms

ethercat.svg

ethercat.svg

154 ms

lazyload.min.js

lazyload.min.js

50 ms

microsoft.svg

microsoft.svg

157 ms

opc-ua.svg

opc-ua.svg

167 ms

can-in-automation.svg

can-in-automation.svg

170 ms

intel.svg

intel.svg

166 ms

rtx64-1.svg

rtx64-1.svg

170 ms

plc-open-motion-control-1.svg

plc-open-motion-control-1.svg

173 ms

KINGSTAR_IZ_1000x263.png

KINGSTAR_IZ_1000x263.png

55 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

23 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0C4k.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0C4k.woff

46 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0C4n.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0C4n.ttf

67 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0C4k.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0C4k.woff

66 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0C4n.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0C4n.ttf

67 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1y4k.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1y4k.woff

67 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1y4n.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1y4n.ttf

67 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1y4k.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1y4k.woff

59 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1y4n.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1y4n.ttf

83 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1y4k.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1y4k.woff

83 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1y4n.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1y4n.ttf

84 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

27 ms

kingstar-components-windows-10-and-RTX64.svg

kingstar-components-windows-10-and-RTX64.svg

122 ms

kingstar-languages.svg

kingstar-languages.svg

196 ms

visual-studio.svg

visual-studio.svg

119 ms

labview.svg

labview.svg

167 ms

qt.svg

qt.svg

189 ms

logiclab.svg

logiclab.svg

191 ms

requirements-for-industry-4.0.svg

requirements-for-industry-4.0.svg

268 ms

machine-automation.jpg

machine-automation.jpg

308 ms

kingstar-components.svg

kingstar-components.svg

247 ms

iiot-pyramid.svg

iiot-pyramid.svg

279 ms

kingstar-white-300x63.png

kingstar-white-300x63.png

259 ms

Linkedin.svg

Linkedin.svg

259 ms

YouTube.svg

YouTube.svg

261 ms

Twitter.svg

Twitter.svg

264 ms

Facebook.svg

Facebook.svg

264 ms

modules.woff

modules.woff

47 ms

Accessibility Review

kingstar.com accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

kingstar.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

kingstar.com SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Kingstar.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Kingstar.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

kingstar.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of KINGSTAR. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: