8 sec in total
449 ms
7.1 sec
486 ms
Welcome to klinikbewertungen.de homepage info - get ready to check Klinik Bewertungen best content for Germany right away, or after learning these important things about klinikbewertungen.de
Erfahrungsberichte und Bewertung von Kliniken. Patienten, Ärzte und Angehörige berichten über Krankenhaus-Erfahrungen und helfen so beim Vergleich von Klinikangeboten.
Visit klinikbewertungen.deWe analyzed Klinikbewertungen.de page load time and found that the first response time was 449 ms and then it took 7.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
klinikbewertungen.de performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.2 s
43/100
10%
Value3.9 s
53/100
25%
Value22.9 s
0/100
10%
Value41,020 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.223
56/100
15%
Value58.7 s
0/100
10%
449 ms
620 ms
201 ms
207 ms
208 ms
Our browser made a total of 141 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 19% of them (27 requests) were addressed to the original Klinikbewertungen.de, 9% (12 requests) were made to Ad.360yield.com and 6% (8 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (900 ms) relates to the external source Fotos.klinikbewertungen.de.
Page size can be reduced by 737.2 kB (49%)
1.5 MB
776.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Klinikbewertungen.de main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 819.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 120.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 120.2 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 34.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Klinik Bewertungen images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 506.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 506.2 kB or 62% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 76.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Klinikbewertungen.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 76.0 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 98 (79%)
124
26
The browser has sent 124 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Klinik Bewertungen. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 49 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
klinikbewertungen.de
449 ms
www.klinikbewertungen.de
620 ms
layout.css
201 ms
content.css
207 ms
form.css
208 ms
fonts.css
208 ms
ad.css
209 ms
chosen.css
236 ms
mobile.css
298 ms
uc.js
620 ms
jquery-1.10.2.min.js
409 ms
tt-basics.js
301 ms
jquery.kbew-common.js
302 ms
naMediaAd.js
286 ms
adsbygoogle.js
6 ms
jquery.kbew-gui-desktop.js
301 ms
counter_xhtml.js
28 ms
css
22 ms
print.css
105 ms
cc.js
298 ms
gpt.js
67 ms
async-ps-2015-12-14.min.js
46 ms
iam.js
409 ms
gw.js
236 ms
s.js
42 ms
back-body.png
215 ms
klinikhartenstein_wildetal_normal.jpg
900 ms
Hausansicht_Rueckseite_normal.jpg
899 ms
head_berggiesshuebel_normal.jpg
819 ms
avicenna_klinik_berlin1_normal.jpg
767 ms
medizinfo-logo-family.png
211 ms
gesuendernet-de-logo-w115.png
211 ms
stars-total.png
209 ms
stars.png
219 ms
icon-twitter-fill-me.png
220 ms
icon-google-fill-me.png
222 ms
klinikbewertungen-logo.png
203 ms
icon-search.png
333 ms
icon-search-la-fill.png
333 ms
icon-next-fill.png
333 ms
pubads_impl_80.js
128 ms
rc
282 ms
back-stars-total.png
162 ms
default.js
173 ms
container.html
93 ms
79863,37923,37922,37924,37925
356 ms
tx.io
513 ms
pixel.gif
397 ms
p.min.js
384 ms
ca-pub-3773743704862245.js
170 ms
zrt_lookup.html
318 ms
show_ads_impl.js
177 ms
731608057.js
293 ms
ga.js
309 ms
t.php
304 ms
icon-totop-la-fill.png
226 ms
evtid=749&sc=test
328 ms
ads
339 ms
osd.js
44 ms
data
509 ms
pql
68 ms
tx.io
110 ms
amzn_ads.js
11 ms
bid
458 ms
m_js_controller.js
53 ms
abg.js
43 ms
favicon
258 ms
s
119 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
146 ms
nessie_icon_tiamat_white.png
62 ms
x_button_blue2.png
61 ms
adex.js
350 ms
adrtxtag.min.js
287 ms
mark_login_v4.php
303 ms
-Wxc5n6ag8mSVPmrosQZJ6hEHpQooK3Qr1Gxv0lUkvE.js
27 ms
2.gif
91 ms
t.js
92 ms
gn;;pack=service_wissen;;theme=subsite;zustand=public;forum=nein;sz=300x250,300x600;;tile=1;;device=desktop;touch=1;view=desktop;vpo=l;vpc=b;flash=0;html5=1;async=1;j4=2;j5=5;i1=4;n3=3;c1=0;c2=2;d7=2;g1=4;j3=4;c3=1;d5=4;d6=4;g2=3;b7=4;k1=1;k2=1;k5=1;f1=1;f2=1;f3=1;f5=1;f6=1;f7=1;z2=1;o3=1;o16=1;o28=1;ord=4924619
434 ms
1.gif
93 ms
analytic.js
170 ms
171 ms
pixel
18 ms
cm.gif
92 ms
nadj
81 ms
show_ads.js
3 ms
show_ads_impl.js
76 ms
pixel
58 ms
generic
52 ms
gn;;pack=service_wissen;;theme=subsite;zustand=public;forum=nein;sz=928x600,728x90,1000x600;;tile=2;;device=desktop;touch=1;view=desktop;vpo=l;vpc=b;flash=0;html5=1;async=1;j4=2;j5=5;i1=4;n3=3;c1=0;c2=2;d7=2;g1=4;j3=4;c3=1;d5=4;d6=4;g2=3;b7=4;k1=1;k2=1;k5=1;f1=1;f2=1;f3=1;f5=1;f6=1;f7=1;z2=1;o3=1;o16=1;o28=1;ord=4924619
386 ms
2.gif
371 ms
match
333 ms
generic
347 ms
ads
334 ms
match
67 ms
match
63 ms
match
161 ms
ads
215 ms
gn;;pack=service_wissen;;theme=subsite;zustand=public;forum=nein;sz=160x600,120x600;;tile=3;;device=desktop;touch=1;view=desktop;vpo=l;vpc=b;flash=0;html5=1;async=1;td=0;sba=0;j4=2;j5=5;i1=4;n3=3;c1=0;c2=2;d7=2;g1=4;j3=4;c3=1;d5=4;d6=4;g2=3;b7=4;k1=1;k2=1;k5=1;f1=1;f2=1;f3=1;f5=1;f6=1;f7=1;z2=1;o3=1;o16=1;o28=1;ord=4924619
350 ms
match
31 ms
default
85 ms
1x1.jpg
113 ms
generic
40 ms
usermatch
86 ms
match
55 ms
js
103 ms
usermatch
46 ms
match
6 ms
pixel
111 ms
casale
34 ms
VsPTJsAoJFEAAD9evUQAAAHN%26362
214 ms
GenericUserSync.ashx
167 ms
match
121 ms
crum
149 ms
img
478 ms
rum
257 ms
crum
318 ms
rum
294 ms
rum
294 ms
match
195 ms
match
258 ms
ads
393 ms
rum
188 ms
2-Q115_Wu_Com__1_Walgreens_Fee_Agent_V4_D_728x90_EN_US.png
94 ms
lidar.js
54 ms
sbhK2lTE.js
54 ms
cTrvNaRi.html
84 ms
adj
517 ms
beacon
383 ms
Packaging-Tubes_120x600.jpg
94 ms
rum
62 ms
surly.js
321 ms
ba.html
36 ms
pixel
29 ms
4.gif
88 ms
pixel
75 ms
pixel
58 ms
4311.js
33 ms
sd
10 ms
box_19_top-right.png
38 ms
ci.png
30 ms
ui
29 ms
klinikbewertungen.de accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
klinikbewertungen.de best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
klinikbewertungen.de SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
DE
DE
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Klinikbewertungen.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Klinikbewertungen.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
klinikbewertungen.de
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Klinik Bewertungen. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: