Tools & Wizards About Us
admission.loyola.edu screenshot

Report Summary

  • 17

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    32% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 97

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    91% of websites

admission.loyola.edu

Undergraduate Admission | Loyola University Maryland

Page Load Speed

6.1 sec in total

First Response

32 ms

Resources Loaded

4.6 sec

Page Rendered

1.4 sec

admission.loyola.edu screenshot

About Website

Welcome to admission.loyola.edu homepage info - get ready to check Admission Loyola best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about admission.loyola.edu

Get all you need to know about the best application plan for you and explore the life of a Loyola student while you're here!

Visit admission.loyola.edu

Key Findings

We analyzed Admission.loyola.edu page load time and found that the first response time was 32 ms and then it took 6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

admission.loyola.edu performance score

17

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.6 s

13/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value13.2 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value45,070 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value56.6 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

undergraduate

32 ms

undergraduate

200 ms

uga_min.css

85 ms

fonts.css

222 ms

jquery-3.4.1.min.js

126 ms

Our browser made a total of 88 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Admission.loyola.edu, 41% (36 requests) were made to Loyola.edu and 13% (11 requests) were made to Webbot.admithub.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) relates to the external source Loyola.edu.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 97.7 kB (7%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Admission.loyola.edu main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 836.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 50.4 kB

  • Original 70.0 kB
  • After minification 67.8 kB
  • After compression 19.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 50.4 kB or 72% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 5.7 kB

  • Original 836.8 kB
  • After minification 831.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Admission Loyola images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 10.1 kB

  • Original 78.4 kB
  • After minification 78.4 kB
  • After compression 68.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 10.1 kB or 13% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 31.6 kB

  • Original 424.3 kB
  • After minification 424.3 kB
  • After compression 392.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Admission.loyola.edu has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (51%)

Requests Now

71

After Optimization

35

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 71 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Admission Loyola. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

undergraduate

undergraduate

32 ms

undergraduate

undergraduate

200 ms

uga_min.css

uga_min.css

85 ms

fonts.css

fonts.css

222 ms

jquery-3.4.1.min.js

jquery-3.4.1.min.js

126 ms

uga_min.js

uga_min.js

159 ms

VisitorIdentification.js

VisitorIdentification.js

106 ms

4CEA79BE6F23A38C2.css

4CEA79BE6F23A38C2.css

11 ms

4cea79be6f23a38c2.css

4cea79be6f23a38c2.css

19 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

879 ms

loyola_logo_rev_svg.svg

loyola_logo_rev_svg.svg

869 ms

search.png

search.png

873 ms

get_started_stacked.svg

get_started_stacked.svg

873 ms

apply_icon_light_svg.svg

apply_icon_light_svg.svg

875 ms

request_info_icon_light_svg.svg

request_info_icon_light_svg.svg

1036 ms

visit_icon_light_svg.svg

visit_icon_light_svg.svg

1038 ms

undergrad_admission_horizontal_svg.svg

undergrad_admission_horizontal_svg.svg

1037 ms

uga_hp_hero.jpg

uga_hp_hero.jpg

1416 ms

hp-hero-2019.png

hp-hero-2019.png

1037 ms

pattern.gif

pattern.gif

1036 ms

hp-icon-mentorship.svg

hp-icon-mentorship.svg

1313 ms

hp-icon-academics.svg

hp-icon-academics.svg

1315 ms

hp-icon-outcomes.svg

hp-icon-outcomes.svg

1334 ms

hp-icon-greyhound-nation.svg

hp-icon-greyhound-nation.svg

1322 ms

spectrum-preview,-d-,min.ashx

spectrum-preview,-d-,min.ashx

1469 ms

vitaliano-preview-min.ashx

vitaliano-preview-min.ashx

1473 ms

royal_sm,-d-,min.ashx

royal_sm,-d-,min.ashx

1467 ms

lauren-b-sm-min.ashx

lauren-b-sm-min.ashx

1468 ms

carlucci_sm,-d-,min.ashx

carlucci_sm,-d-,min.ashx

1467 ms

tallon_sm,-d-,min.ashx

tallon_sm,-d-,min.ashx

1474 ms

footer_diag.png

footer_diag.png

1907 ms

loyola_logo_bw_svg.svg

loyola_logo_bw_svg.svg

1848 ms

sm_twitter_light_svg.svg

sm_twitter_light_svg.svg

1845 ms

sm_youtube_light_svg.svg

sm_youtube_light_svg.svg

1851 ms

sm_facebook_light_svg.svg

sm_facebook_light_svg.svg

1846 ms

sm_instagram_light_svg.svg

sm_instagram_light_svg.svg

1850 ms

jVFlvB1Dv1eHFzj8B4UIeRUedqgFY70+h6P7JL1rUL+1TW1cNTp1mJjw9cHajVaYg33wFlIBPT

jVFlvB1Dv1eHFzj8B4UIeRUedqgFY70+h6P7JL1rUL+1TW1cNTp1mJjw9cHajVaYg33wFlIBPT

37 ms

jVFlvB1Dv1eHFzj8B4UIeRUedqgFY70+h6P7JL1rUL+1TW1cNTp1mJjw9cHajVaYg33wFlIBPT

jVFlvB1Dv1eHFzj8B4UIeRUedqgFY70+h6P7JL1rUL+1TW1cNTp1mJjw9cHajVaYg33wFlIBPT

37 ms

skvWtQv7VNbVw1OnWYmPD1wdqNVpiDffAWUgE9M=

skvWtQv7VNbVw1OnWYmPD1wdqNVpiDffAWUgE9M=

22 ms

tU1tXDU6dZiY8PXB2o1WmIN98BZSAT0w==

tU1tXDU6dZiY8PXB2o1WmIN98BZSAT0w==

22 ms

search_icon_svg.svg

search_icon_svg.svg

1073 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

36 ms

insight.min.js

insight.min.js

451 ms

siteanalyze_66356685.js

siteanalyze_66356685.js

560 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

457 ms

uwt.js

uwt.js

562 ms

bat.js

bat.js

504 ms

webchat.js

webchat.js

597 ms

ping

ping

451 ms

ping

ping

137 ms

ping

ping

499 ms

js

js

157 ms

collect

collect

293 ms

collect

collect

461 ms

eee0a8e8d64140009a42ae5df476ff0b

eee0a8e8d64140009a42ae5df476ff0b

661 ms

3814819711877479

3814819711877479

498 ms

25057702.js

25057702.js

389 ms

ppt=17304;g=sitewide_pixel;gid=40263;ord=2883168

ppt=17304;g=sitewide_pixel;gid=40263;ord=2883168

439 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

484 ms

logger.min.js

logger.min.js

385 ms

webchatPopUp.html

webchatPopUp.html

113 ms

webchatIframe.html

webchatIframe.html

149 ms

webchat.css

webchat.css

163 ms

image.aspx

image.aspx

228 ms

25057702

25057702

638 ms

adsct

adsct

589 ms

adsct

adsct

588 ms

css

css

190 ms

webchatPopUp.css

webchatPopUp.css

105 ms

webchatPopUp.js

webchatPopUp.js

270 ms

webchatIframe.css

webchatIframe.css

147 ms

webchatIframe.js

webchatIframe.js

557 ms

collect

collect

928 ms

collect

collect

951 ms

857 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff

820 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc-.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc-.woff

926 ms

admithub-icon-2-8.87e53cb7.ttf

admithub-icon-2-8.87e53cb7.ttf

629 ms

clarity.js

clarity.js

750 ms

193 ms

233 ms

f50efbc347dd4e01bd193a79a133d677.png

f50efbc347dd4e01bd193a79a133d677.png

331 ms

105 ms

218 ms

153 ms

heat.aspx

heat.aspx

4 ms

heat.aspx

heat.aspx

5 ms

c.gif

c.gif

37 ms

Accessibility Review

admission.loyola.edu accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

admission.loyola.edu best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

admission.loyola.edu SEO score

97

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Admission.loyola.edu can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Admission.loyola.edu main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

admission.loyola.edu

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Admission Loyola. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: