38.7 sec in total
736 ms
29.5 sec
8.4 sec
Visit bufetum.livejournal.com now to see the best up-to-date Bufetum Live Journal content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about bufetum.livejournal.com
КУЛИНАЛИРИКА БУФЕТА. КУХНЯ КАК ФОРМА ОТДЫХА :)
Visit bufetum.livejournal.comWe analyzed Bufetum.livejournal.com page load time and found that the first response time was 736 ms and then it took 37.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there was 1 request timeout, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.
bufetum.livejournal.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.9 s
4/100
10%
Value30.5 s
0/100
25%
Value19.7 s
0/100
10%
Value3,650 ms
1/100
30%
Value0.328
35/100
15%
Value31.8 s
0/100
10%
736 ms
42 ms
78 ms
46 ms
189 ms
Our browser made a total of 108 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Bufetum.livejournal.com, 18% (19 requests) were made to L-stat.livejournal.net and 9% (10 requests) were made to Ssp.rambler.ru. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (20.4 sec) relates to the external source Imrk.net.
Page size can be reduced by 383.6 kB (15%)
2.6 MB
2.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Bufetum.livejournal.com main page is 2.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 197.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 197.7 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 114.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Bufetum Live Journal images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 63.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 63.1 kB or 61% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 7.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bufetum.livejournal.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 7.9 kB or 77% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 57 (74%)
77
20
The browser has sent 77 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bufetum Live Journal. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
bufetum.livejournal.com
736 ms
l-stat.livejournal.net
42 ms
l-stat.livejournal.net
78 ms
l-stat.livejournal.net
46 ms
l-stat.livejournal.net
189 ms
49 ms
screen.css
50 ms
stylesheet
186 ms
368 ms
343 ms
xtcore.js
361 ms
analytics.js
329 ms
rta.js
335 ms
36844192
308 ms
2%20%2827%29.JPG
3133 ms
valid10360_h207e2a9fd924816ae514528dfb6acc36.jpg
308 ms
721
310 ms
3174 ms
bg.png
286 ms
userinfo.gif
282 ms
print-logo.png
282 ms
data_rss.gif
282 ms
data_atom.gif
284 ms
11f.JPG
3325 ms
10%20%283%29.JPG
2999 ms
3%20%2819%29.JPG
5006 ms
1%20%D0%9B%D0%90%D0%9F%D0%A8%D0%90%20%D0%93%D0%A0%D0%95%D0%91%D0%95%D0%A8%D0%9A%D0%98%D0%98%20%281%29.JPG
3547 ms
6%20%D0%97%D0%A1.jpg
5025 ms
1%20%2846%29.JPG
3313 ms
1%20%2847%29.JPG
3832 ms
gtm.js
277 ms
autocontext2_async.js
681 ms
beacon.js
273 ms
l.lj-toys.com
377 ms
logo.svg
191 ms
s-icons.svg
203 ms
userinfo_v3.svg
201 ms
dotted-line.png
203 ms
valid10360_h207e2a9fd924816ae514528dfb6acc36.jpg
410 ms
Bo7NPxsjdfg
2243 ms
CaMCUg==
384 ms
6iMf6F5oPfgFuPAEB
368 ms
QRzzWv9J88AsQYwKv
183 ms
autocontext2_async.js
998 ms
valid10360_h207e2a9fd924816ae514528dfb6acc36.jpg
2030 ms
top100.js
1034 ms
yandex_metrika.js
229 ms
emily
1015 ms
begun.html
1009 ms
autocontext2_async_main.d94e28a87d.js
996 ms
green2.min.js
1147 ms
twemoji.min.js
1712 ms
www-embed-player-vfl5foy2V.css
570 ms
www-embed-player.js
1024 ms
base.js
1523 ms
emily
207 ms
watch.js
25 ms
381 ms
autocontext2.js
246 ms
top100.scn
397 ms
421 ms
autocontext2.js
156 ms
ban.ban
365 ms
autocontext2_main.8328b00fb4.js
333 ms
pixel.gif
179 ms
autocontext2_main.8328b00fb4.js
1526 ms
veBs87dwiCXgZb9CwomBYiW1hyWXgp0ohA3Vj3gnbUg.js
351 ms
ad_status.js
226 ms
hit.xiti
268 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
222 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
214 ms
begun_scripts.508f4b3b74.js
322 ms
begun_utils.4a33756f76.js
166 ms
begun_utils.4a33756f76.js
1088 ms
context.jsp
169 ms
context.jsp
182 ms
begun_tpl_block_468x60.2238ede18e.js
186 ms
begun_tpl_block_468x60.2238ede18e.js
620 ms
sandbox
325 ms
begun
361 ms
sync.gif
1654 ms
begun
368 ms
cnysBEGUN.gif
333 ms
saveRtbUser
482 ms
sync
1624 ms
userbind
20383 ms
sync
554 ms
rta.js
149 ms
log_errors
285 ms
log_errors
398 ms
cnysBEGUN.gif
52 ms
pixel.gif
253 ms
begun
141 ms
begun
43 ms
image
129 ms
audsp
349 ms
sync
4077 ms
sync
174 ms
madnetx
276 ms
admitad
1402 ms
audsp
202 ms
renegade
124 ms
pixel
61 ms
pixel
153 ms
203 ms
sync
118 ms
pixel.gif
145 ms
sync2.204
1133 ms
bufetum.livejournal.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
bufetum.livejournal.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
bufetum.livejournal.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
RU
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bufetum.livejournal.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Bufetum.livejournal.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
bufetum.livejournal.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Bufetum Live Journal. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: