12.2 sec in total
123 ms
11.5 sec
537 ms
Visit l1n.com now to see the best up-to-date L 1 N content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about l1n.com
Layer One is the premier IT consulting firms in Corpus Christi, TX. We provide IT consulting services, cloud management, network solutions.
Visit l1n.comWe analyzed L1n.com page load time and found that the first response time was 123 ms and then it took 12 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
l1n.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.5 s
34/100
10%
Value8.7 s
1/100
25%
Value9.1 s
14/100
10%
Value4,630 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.02
100/100
15%
Value9.9 s
27/100
10%
123 ms
114 ms
527 ms
456 ms
956 ms
Our browser made a total of 45 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 51% of them (23 requests) were addressed to the original L1n.com, 11% (5 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net and 9% (4 requests) were made to Use.fontawesome.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (10.3 sec) relates to the external source Cdn.oribi.io.
Page size can be reduced by 67.6 kB (3%)
2.2 MB
2.1 MB
In fact, the total size of L1n.com main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 60.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 60.7 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. L 1 N images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 854 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 4.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. L1n.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (70%)
37
11
The browser has sent 37 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of L 1 N. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
l1n.com
123 ms
l1n.com
114 ms
all.css
527 ms
js
456 ms
payload.js
956 ms
style.min.css
385 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
837 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
838 ms
bootstrap.min.css
423 ms
qrh8toe.css
514 ms
landing.css
905 ms
sub.css
911 ms
style.css
912 ms
all.css
910 ms
jetpack.css
751 ms
bootstrap.min.js
512 ms
jquery.min.js
946 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
913 ms
navigation.js
908 ms
functions.js
907 ms
skip-link-focus-fix.js
911 ms
eu-cookie-law.min.js
939 ms
e-202240.js
388 ms
analytics.js
255 ms
cropped-layerone_logo.png
225 ms
lo-arrow-down.svg
223 ms
layerone_footer-logo.png
222 ms
gtm.js
208 ms
oribi.js
10292 ms
collect
116 ms
fbevents.js
390 ms
collect
448 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
641 ms
p.css
220 ms
345030092957544
196 ms
d
125 ms
d
108 ms
d
106 ms
d
108 ms
layerone_hero.jpg
396 ms
layerone_hero_320.jpg
779 ms
lo-arrow-right.svg
373 ms
layerone_subfooter.jpg
657 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
87 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
150 ms
l1n.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
l1n.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
l1n.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise L1n.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that L1n.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
l1n.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of L 1 N. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: