14.7 sec in total
37 ms
9 sec
5.6 sec
Visit labeb.com now to see the best up-to-date Labeb content for Saudi Arabia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about labeb.com
قارن بين اسعار آلاف المنتجات الالكترونية والموبايل والكمبيوتر وملحقاتها في محلات السعودية، تابع أسعارها وأحدث العروض والتخفيضات في الرياض والمملكة في موقع لبيب
Visit labeb.comWe analyzed Labeb.com page load time and found that the first response time was 37 ms and then it took 14.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
labeb.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.9 s
1/100
10%
Value27.5 s
0/100
25%
Value62.5 s
0/100
10%
Value71,850 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.797
5/100
15%
Value87.9 s
0/100
10%
37 ms
424 ms
3523 ms
294 ms
2444 ms
Our browser made a total of 90 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Labeb.com, 13% (12 requests) were made to Sa.labeb.com and 13% (12 requests) were made to Cm.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.5 sec) relates to the external source Sa.labeb.com.
Page size can be reduced by 697.9 kB (56%)
1.2 MB
539.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Labeb.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 744.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 684.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 248.0 kB, which is 33% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 684.1 kB or 92% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 11.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Labeb images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 2.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 19 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Labeb.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 50 (60%)
84
34
The browser has sent 84 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Labeb. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 31 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
labeb.com
37 ms
www.labeb.com
424 ms
sa.labeb.com
3523 ms
header.min.css
294 ms
analytics.min.js
2444 ms
autotrack.min.js
2444 ms
adsbygoogle.js
67 ms
hotjar-2451677.js
2158 ms
logo-w190.png
2905 ms
show_ads_impl.js
2121 ms
zrt_lookup.html
2469 ms
jquery-3.5.1.min.js
1129 ms
popper.min.js
1030 ms
bootstrap.bundle.min.js
979 ms
select2.min.js
1220 ms
lozad.min.js
1018 ms
slick.min.js
2857 ms
typeahead.bundle.min.js
2355 ms
endless.min.js
1107 ms
main.min.js
2838 ms
loading2.svg
959 ms
analytics.js
1016 ms
modules.61e17720cf639c3e96a7.js
2309 ms
rum.js
195 ms
box-69edcc3187336f9b0a3fbb4c73be9fe6.html
2095 ms
cookie.js
2115 ms
integrator.js
2180 ms
ads
343 ms
linkid.js
1822 ms
collect
1825 ms
ads
641 ms
ads
557 ms
ads
640 ms
ads
791 ms
ads
639 ms
ads
524 ms
ads
874 ms
ads
1098 ms
collect
124 ms
visit-data
418 ms
ga-audiences
42 ms
afr.php
430 ms
window_focus.js
128 ms
cookie_push_onload.html
59 ms
qs_click_protection.js
298 ms
rx_lidar.js
306 ms
dpixel
436 ms
privacy_small.svg
434 ms
lg.php
563 ms
webfontloader.js
529 ms
adchoices_en.svg
529 ms
close_button.svg
522 ms
back_button2.svg
523 ms
3901e7f1076548768dd426f395d925f6_museosans_500.woff
481 ms
load_preloaded_resource.js
286 ms
abg_lite.js
322 ms
042791247ab671b2831aa311d6583330.js
456 ms
animejs.js
436 ms
downsize_200k_v1
300 ms
downsize_200k_v1
291 ms
img
352 ms
criteo_logo_2021.svg
277 ms
privacy.svg
309 ms
img
352 ms
img
348 ms
img
348 ms
pixel
121 ms
pixel
203 ms
trk
225 ms
css
168 ms
pixel
87 ms
pixel
121 ms
pixel
118 ms
pixel
117 ms
pixel
133 ms
pixel
131 ms
pixel
132 ms
e415b53e2fa2455db9024e67a8095ff7_tradegothicltstd-bdcn20.woff
60 ms
pixel
100 ms
activeview
49 ms
pixel
45 ms
activeview
121 ms
pixel
114 ms
YrdBSjzfIHcYhYLmavhSyO_EhBrLUWpx5ykdL7H9Kqg.js
12 ms
rum.js
119 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf
127 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
128 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf
128 ms
sodar
108 ms
sodar2.js
28 ms
labeb.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
labeb.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
labeb.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
AR
AR
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Labeb.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Arabic is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Labeb.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
labeb.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Labeb. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: