2.4 sec in total
267 ms
1.5 sec
583 ms
Visit lalkitab.in now to see the best up-to-date Lal Kitab content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about lalkitab.in
The objective of this blog is to spread knowledge of Lal Kitab and clear off the myths and the controversies surrounding this excellent astrological system.
Visit lalkitab.inWe analyzed Lalkitab.in page load time and found that the first response time was 267 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
lalkitab.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.5 s
68/100
10%
Value3.1 s
74/100
25%
Value2.7 s
96/100
10%
Value450 ms
62/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value6.0 s
64/100
10%
267 ms
178 ms
28 ms
109 ms
12 ms
Our browser made a total of 66 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Lalkitab.in, 17% (11 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 11% (7 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (505 ms) relates to the external source Google.com.
Page size can be reduced by 753.3 kB (58%)
1.3 MB
536.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Lalkitab.in main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 77.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 77.8 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 15.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Lal Kitab needs image optimization as it can save up to 15.0 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 614.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 614.8 kB or 61% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 45.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lalkitab.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 45.7 kB or 73% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (45%)
62
34
The browser has sent 62 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lal Kitab. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
lalkitab.in
267 ms
www.lalkitab.in
178 ms
521441841-css_bundle_v2.css
28 ms
plusone.js
109 ms
show_ads.js
12 ms
lalkitab
95 ms
2345592501-widgets.js
25 ms
icon18_wrench_allbkg.png
25 ms
icon18_email.gif
30 ms
icon18_edit_allbkg.gif
31 ms
authorization.css
26 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
58 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
79 ms
google_top_exp.js
54 ms
gradients_light.png
55 ms
ca-pub-7494543079410386.js
171 ms
zrt_lookup.html
196 ms
show_ads_impl.js
126 ms
buzzboost-pwrd.gif
136 ms
ga.js
30 ms
body_gradient_tile_light.png
29 ms
__utm.gif
55 ms
navbar.g
105 ms
ads
219 ms
osd.js
39 ms
followers.g
62 ms
ads
233 ms
ads
239 ms
icons_peach.png
47 ms
platform:gapi.iframes.style.common.js
26 ms
arrows-light.png
47 ms
ServiceLogin
82 ms
ads
220 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
16 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
32 ms
fastbutton
43 ms
postmessageRelay
38 ms
rs=AGLTcCOnDxwX8-LbpDmaxOBIoHm7W_kGNA
14 ms
followers.g
136 ms
971028622-postmessagerelay.js
19 ms
rpc:shindig_random.js
25 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
3 ms
abg.js
26 ms
osd_listener.js
38 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
28 ms
photo.jpg
57 ms
photo.jpg
390 ms
rfIdNujE9UtStgMjFcVR9A8pQ70Y7AJqhorQ9BqzsGitCb5gmJ7EnOJOjm5Ys5aBnGz0_eHXUmaXjLmEW0T4Cb1ejzN4OeKl
243 ms
Prasanna%25252Bphoto.jpg
234 ms
photo.jpg
162 ms
photo.jpg
182 ms
photo.jpg
59 ms
photo.jpg
142 ms
photo.jpg
61 ms
3U1uUa4piM9StgMjFcVR9Cz98PHdTai_ws74rURW_wuxR8TrNnupX26-kw68mIZSmUcRoikZ5kGXjLmEW0T4Cb1ejzN4OeKl
397 ms
R64Wmg69w9BStgMjFcVR9L0dYlJWQ3br8y1Zfbpdtw4yQhifO6MzRP7zBOEjcLM0ldfWNijNN4mXjLmEW0T4Cb1ejzN4OeKl
453 ms
QNWRgZI7h0RStgMjFcVR9Atylb2JIong8fR5TiLeatH6j-RHsGlom4HsrTqDtLilVdfFRMUnfuyXjLmEW0T4Cb1ejzN4OeKl
454 ms
GXDr9xP7MFhStgMjFcVR9G9ZqS06iKxxc5Fup4-awOeKCTdCZU2FSzDNETK_0VCY4dY0nuOblBqXjLmEW0T4Cb1ejzN4OeKl
505 ms
-VJjOeinaZJStgMjFcVR9GOydDz5-bHgnHjEf43HS3hV0ukdUe5Wl1H88RIj3OnOuaC_w0OcAHiXjLmEW0T4Cb1ejzN4OeKl
352 ms
X4MrgtAqdlNStgMjFcVR9B7QWj4Hl_Gdqptl8E3ptSPwTK-pcCaT7eNTAlq9d6luhixOgB62pUSXjLmEW0T4Cb1ejzN4OeKl
357 ms
photo.jpg
139 ms
photo.jpg
61 ms
photo.jpg
144 ms
photo.jpg
212 ms
photo.jpg
144 ms
photo.jpg
82 ms
lalkitab.in accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
lalkitab.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Browser errors were logged to the console
lalkitab.in SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lalkitab.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Lalkitab.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lalkitab.in
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Lal Kitab. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: