3.2 sec in total
536 ms
2.1 sec
585 ms
Click here to check amazing Lanche 86 content for Serbia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about lanche86.com
PHP / WordPress Developer / WordCamp Belgrade Organisator
Visit lanche86.comWe analyzed Lanche86.com page load time and found that the first response time was 536 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
lanche86.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.0 s
83/100
10%
Value4.5 s
38/100
25%
Value6.7 s
36/100
10%
Value1,800 ms
10/100
30%
Value0.395
26/100
15%
Value6.7 s
57/100
10%
536 ms
175 ms
176 ms
171 ms
176 ms
Our browser made a total of 120 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 32% of them (38 requests) were addressed to the original Lanche86.com, 13% (15 requests) were made to Pixel.wp.com and 8% (9 requests) were made to Thumbs.videopress.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Lanche86.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.9 MB (45%)
4.2 MB
2.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Lanche86.com main page is 4.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 63.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 63.9 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 566.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Lanche 86 needs image optimization as it can save up to 566.2 kB or 24% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 866.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 866.7 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 373.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lanche86.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 373.3 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 76 (68%)
111
35
The browser has sent 111 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lanche 86. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 49 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
lanche86.com
536 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
175 ms
twentysixteen.css
176 ms
crayon.min.css
171 ms
mediaelementplayer.min.css
176 ms
wp-mediaelement.css
182 ms
css
74 ms
genericons.css
338 ms
style.css
259 ms
twentysixteen.css
265 ms
jetpack.css
266 ms
jquery.js
371 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
300 ms
crayon.min.js
369 ms
spin.js
393 ms
jquery.spin.js
396 ms
tiled-gallery.js
401 ms
jscripts.php
469 ms
videopress-iframe.js
26 ms
responsive-videos.css
308 ms
infinity.js
320 ms
jquery.cycle.js
328 ms
slideshow-shortcode.js
335 ms
photon.js
426 ms
jetpack-carousel.js
427 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
470 ms
wp-mediaelement.js
472 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
8 ms
skip-link-focus-fix.js
474 ms
functions.js
470 ms
jscripts-ftr-min.js
488 ms
wp-embed.min.js
487 ms
postmessage.js
487 ms
jquery.jetpack-resize.js
645 ms
jquery.inview.js
644 ms
queuehandler.js
648 ms
responsive-videos.min.js
651 ms
sharing.js
654 ms
e-201611.js
5 ms
analytics.js
8 ms
collect
38 ms
collect
56 ms
223562.js
226 ms
a7c1548af31e4c6c6bdac08941e00809
125 ms
J44FHXvg
123 ms
square-volunteer.png
647 ms
loading.gif
988 ms
0taparK5
128 ms
IQHow_FEYlDC4Gzy_m8fcgFhaRv2pGgT5Kf0An0s4MM.woff
145 ms
zhcz-_WihjSQC0oHJ9TCYBsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
197 ms
RFda8w1V0eDZheqfcyQ4EBa1RVmPjeKy21_GQJaLlJI.woff
305 ms
ZvcMqxEwPfh2qDWBPxn6nhGYIVA-f1n-gQW6IKoy_-M.woff
305 ms
ZvcMqxEwPfh2qDWBPxn6njPY4jw7fdqC-GX3uhj9onc.woff
303 ms
Genericons.svg
1173 ms
8AAnjaY2BgYGQAgosrjpwF0ZcUq9bCaABTzgdAAAA=
5 ms
d_c4gRps6kY
297 ms
videopress-routes.js
144 ms
RVMvART9kb8
490 ms
CdPn1mCmqoE
393 ms
J44FHXvg
345 ms
ga.js
387 ms
0taparK5
380 ms
www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css
548 ms
www-embed-player.js
621 ms
master.html
317 ms
1f609.png
548 ms
share
391 ms
g.gif
122 ms
graph.facebook.com
379 ms
share
409 ms
graph.facebook.com
496 ms
share
525 ms
graph.facebook.com
494 ms
share
555 ms
graph.facebook.com
493 ms
share
521 ms
graph.facebook.com
491 ms
share
513 ms
graph.facebook.com
487 ms
share
511 ms
graph.facebook.com
488 ms
g.gif
96 ms
g.gif
97 ms
g.gif
97 ms
g.gif
95 ms
g.gif
96 ms
g.gif
134 ms
g.gif
134 ms
g.gif
132 ms
g.gif
139 ms
g.gif
139 ms
g.gif
131 ms
g.gif
353 ms
g.gif
353 ms
g.gif
326 ms
J44FHXvg
403 ms
J44FHXvg
447 ms
jquery.js
164 ms
video-0e8f70a936_scruberthumbnail_0.jpg
368 ms
0taparK5
386 ms
0taparK5
397 ms
0taparK5
379 ms
0taparK5
396 ms
0taparK5
400 ms
0taparK5
401 ms
0taparK5
405 ms
__utm.gif
135 ms
__utm.gif
204 ms
video-9dd7101d7d_scruberthumbnail_2.jpg
378 ms
postmessage.js
105 ms
jed.js
115 ms
underscore.min.js
115 ms
fBnyGA8Aionz5086-mElmoOSPUuyQ1M9Un647_EjucU.js
113 ms
ad_status.js
113 ms
2UX7WLTfW3W8TclTUvlFyQ.woff
50 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
48 ms
jquery.wpcom-proxy-request.js
14 ms
20 ms
81 ms
likes-rest.js
10 ms
lanche86.com accessibility score
lanche86.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
lanche86.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lanche86.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lanche86.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lanche86.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Lanche 86. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: