3.3 sec in total
186 ms
2.7 sec
409 ms
Welcome to landport.net homepage info - get ready to check Landport best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about landport.net
Easy-to-use, powerful & affordable work order management software solutions for facility managers
Visit landport.netWe analyzed Landport.net page load time and found that the first response time was 186 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
landport.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
51/100
10%
Value6.9 s
6/100
25%
Value5.7 s
52/100
10%
Value100 ms
98/100
30%
Value1.366
0/100
15%
Value6.8 s
55/100
10%
186 ms
997 ms
177 ms
220 ms
174 ms
Our browser made a total of 73 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 73% of them (53 requests) were addressed to the original Landport.net, 15% (11 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (997 ms) belongs to the original domain Landport.net.
Page size can be reduced by 164.1 kB (13%)
1.2 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Landport.net main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 53.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 53.5 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 10.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Landport images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 55.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 55.5 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 44.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Landport.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 44.5 kB or 80% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (72%)
57
16
The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Landport. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 25 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
landport.net
186 ms
www.landport.net
997 ms
sq_frontend.css
177 ms
29-layout.css
220 ms
styles.css
174 ms
site.min.css
172 ms
slick.css
221 ms
slick-slider-style.css
219 ms
wpfront-scroll-top.min.css
267 ms
bootstrap.min.css
344 ms
flexslider.css
265 ms
style.css
353 ms
font-awesome.min.css
20 ms
css
16 ms
style.css
256 ms
owl.carousel.min.css
267 ms
owl.theme.default.css
333 ms
jquery.js
430 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
358 ms
wpfront-scroll-top.min.js
358 ms
css
15 ms
bootstrap.min.css
413 ms
font-awesome.min.css
419 ms
pe-icon-7-stroke.css
472 ms
animate.min.css
474 ms
style-jer.css
469 ms
blue.css
520 ms
jquery.waypoints.min.js
503 ms
29-layout.js
506 ms
scripts.js
510 ms
skip-link-focus-fix.js
594 ms
flexslider.min.js
594 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
595 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
594 ms
shapely-scripts.js
595 ms
core.min.js
602 ms
position.min.js
622 ms
site.min.js
559 ms
wp-embed.min.js
619 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
478 ms
cropped-cropped-x-1_logo.png
221 ms
hero-mockup-x1-1.png
685 ms
step1.jpg
221 ms
step2.jpg
296 ms
step3.jpg
303 ms
about-image.jpg
541 ms
css
36 ms
css
46 ms
special-feature-bg-1179x435.jpg
360 ms
step4.jpg
302 ms
x1-screen4.jpg
298 ms
x1-screen2.jpg
300 ms
x1-screen1.jpg
403 ms
x1-screen3.jpg
419 ms
1.png
386 ms
float.ls
228 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
63 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
63 ms
Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
84 ms
d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
86 ms
APH4jr0uSos5wiut5cpjronF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
85 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
319 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
26 ms
bIcY3_3JNqUVRAQQRNVteQ.ttf
24 ms
CcKI4k9un7TZVWzRVT-T8y3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
25 ms
-_Ctzj9b56b8RgXW8FAriS3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
24 ms
RJMlAoFXXQEzZoMSUteGWKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
25 ms
xkvoNo9fC8O2RDydKj12by3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
25 ms
JbtMzqLaYbbbCL9X6EvaIy3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
25 ms
Pe-icon-7-stroke.woff
391 ms
contact-bg.jpg
379 ms
floatsupportbtn.css
318 ms
track.js
384 ms
landport.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
landport.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
landport.net SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Landport.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Landport.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
landport.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Landport. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: