6.4 sec in total
2.1 sec
3.9 sec
445 ms
Welcome to language-efficiency.com homepage info - get ready to check Language Efficiency best content for Russia right away, or after learning these important things about language-efficiency.com
В 272 эпизоде подкаста подкаста, посвященному изучению испанского по методу сторителлинг, мы узнаем, как по-испански говорить о человеческих качествах.
Visit language-efficiency.comWe analyzed Language-efficiency.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2.1 sec and then it took 4.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
language-efficiency.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.4 s
37/100
10%
Value3.6 s
62/100
25%
Value6.3 s
42/100
10%
Value390 ms
69/100
30%
Value0.586
11/100
15%
Value6.8 s
56/100
10%
2053 ms
322 ms
355 ms
354 ms
353 ms
Our browser made a total of 73 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (58 requests) were addressed to the original Language-efficiency.com, 4% (3 requests) were made to S.gravatar.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Language-efficiency.com.
Page size can be reduced by 407.3 kB (39%)
1.0 MB
630.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Language-efficiency.com main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 499.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 32.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 32.9 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 13.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Language Efficiency images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 186.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 186.7 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 174.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Language-efficiency.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 174.5 kB or 79% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (53%)
68
32
The browser has sent 68 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Language Efficiency. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
language-efficiency.com
2053 ms
style.css
322 ms
color-picker.min.css
355 ms
style.css
354 ms
flashblock.css
353 ms
player.css
352 ms
style.css
352 ms
custom.css
413 ms
style.css
424 ms
postratings-css.css
415 ms
style.css
416 ms
jcountdown.css
420 ms
jcountdown.css
423 ms
jetpack.css
481 ms
podpress.css
489 ms
1pixelout_audio-player.js
493 ms
jquery.min.js
300 ms
soundmanager2-nodebug-jsmin.js
492 ms
podpress.js
490 ms
script.js
526 ms
conversion.js
139 ms
content-shortcodes.css
562 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
562 ms
custom.js
567 ms
jquery.jcountdown.min.js
568 ms
front.js
566 ms
postratings-js.js
564 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
191 ms
gprofiles.js
231 ms
wpgroho.js
724 ms
jquery.lwtCountdown-1.0.js
726 ms
custom.js
714 ms
jquery.jcountdown.js
712 ms
wp-embed.min.js
730 ms
e-201614.js
194 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
400 ms
analytics.js
37 ms
img-1.jpg
490 ms
5f041d172_115x115.png
357 ms
b9ed2bcd8_115x115.png
357 ms
6ca6e793a_115x115.png
357 ms
677dae971_115x115.png
356 ms
28d850c68_115x115.png
354 ms
db2136790_115x115.png
460 ms
img-2.jpg
710 ms
%D1%81%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B8.jpg
461 ms
img-3.jpg
586 ms
cc81a6a06_70x70.png
457 ms
ac938c8d9_70x70.png
510 ms
7dd3bc371_70x70.png
512 ms
89e0e0fee_70x70.png
519 ms
ca66fdf68_70x70.png
569 ms
21beb5a25_70x70.png
579 ms
f0bafd64b_70x70.png
582 ms
5fc4665da_70x70.png
601 ms
itunes.jpg
641 ms
YOUTUBE4.jpg
651 ms
package.jpg
1302 ms
ico-2.jpg
652 ms
ico-3.jpg
674 ms
117 ms
sl.png
846 ms
e.png
701 ms
collect
20 ms
impact-webfont.ttf
640 ms
rating_over.gif
659 ms
collect
257 ms
243 ms
watch.js
133 ms
hovercard.css
42 ms
services.css
72 ms
g.gif
28 ms
ga-audiences
31 ms
language-efficiency.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
language-efficiency.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
language-efficiency.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
![]()
RU
![]()
RU
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Language-efficiency.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Language-efficiency.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
language-efficiency.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Language Efficiency. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: