16.7 sec in total
622 ms
15.3 sec
779 ms
Visit laserflex.ru now to see the best up-to-date Laserflex content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about laserflex.ru
Услуги по лазерной гравировке и резке. Производство номерков, бейджей, табличек, шильдов и наградных досок в Москве. Качественно, быстро. ООО «Лазер Флекс».
Visit laserflex.ruWe analyzed Laserflex.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 622 ms and then it took 16.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
laserflex.ru performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.4 s
38/100
10%
Value11.3 s
0/100
25%
Value13.9 s
1/100
10%
Value21,430 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.492
17/100
15%
Value37.6 s
0/100
10%
622 ms
252 ms
370 ms
375 ms
370 ms
Our browser made a total of 67 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (52 requests) were addressed to the original Laserflex.ru, 7% (5 requests) were made to Static.siteheart.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (11.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Laserflex.ru.
Page size can be reduced by 972.1 kB (44%)
2.2 MB
1.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Laserflex.ru main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 34.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 34.3 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 137.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Laserflex needs image optimization as it can save up to 137.3 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 601.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 601.2 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 199.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Laserflex.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 199.2 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (49%)
61
31
The browser has sent 61 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Laserflex. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.laserflex.ru
622 ms
widgetkit-7f1e3991.css
252 ms
css_loader.php
370 ms
rokajaxsearch.css
375 ms
rokajaxsearch-theme.css
370 ms
bootstrap.css
375 ms
icomoon.css
371 ms
layout.css
376 ms
animations.css
508 ms
white.css
508 ms
red.css
520 ms
white.css
523 ms
jquery.min.js
803 ms
jquery-noconflict.js
526 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
638 ms
caption.js
636 ms
bootstrap.min.js
647 ms
widgetkit-978c5c5b.js
673 ms
yui.combo.js
1008 ms
mootools-core.js
934 ms
core.js
799 ms
mootools-more.js
1785 ms
rokajaxsearch.js
891 ms
jquery.pwebcontact.min.js
938 ms
template.css
943 ms
style.css
973 ms
css
41 ms
css
69 ms
lightbox.js
199 ms
mediaelement-and-player.js
459 ms
spotlight.js
362 ms
sh.js
365 ms
sinij-fon.jpg
694 ms
logo.png
1081 ms
h3-title.png
345 ms
search-icon.png
139 ms
tablichki.png
344 ms
bejdzhi.png
675 ms
nomerki.png
694 ms
shildy.png
1179 ms
silk.png
980 ms
laser_eng.png
1634 ms
laser_cut.png
2705 ms
cut.png
5775 ms
3d-printer.png
2958 ms
certificate-01.jpg
4803 ms
certificate-02-tb.jpg
2112 ms
certificate-03.jpg
11757 ms
uqFpzDRr-oQw71LHgsWhDw.ttf
104 ms
53FiIA9tShIIWgCiX49s-vesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf
104 ms
IcoMoon.svg
4649 ms
topfade.png
4016 ms
footer-logo.png
3678 ms
watch.js
64 ms
close.png
4675 ms
blank.gif
4548 ms
html;charset=utf-8,%3Chtml%3E%3Chead%3E%3Cscript%20type%3D%22text%2Fjavascript%22%3Ewindow.onresize%3Dfunction()%7Bwindow.parent.YAHOO.widget.Module.textResizeEvent.fire()%3B%7D%3B%3C%2Fscript%3E%3C%2Fhead%3E%3Cbody%3E%3C%2Fbody%3E%3C%2Fhtml%3E
154 ms
m-ico.png
4669 ms
menu-bullet.png
5470 ms
sh.js
739 ms
widget.js
304 ms
widget.js
2277 ms
red.css
602 ms
logo.png
72 ms
a.html
32 ms
analytics.js
207 ms
collect
39 ms
laserflex.ru accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
laserflex.ru best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
laserflex.ru SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
RU
RU
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Laserflex.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Laserflex.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
laserflex.ru
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Laserflex. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: