5.7 sec in total
1.7 sec
3.4 sec
656 ms
Welcome to laserlabel.net homepage info - get ready to check Laser Label best content right away, or after learning these important things about laserlabel.net
Label & Ribbon Pros | Laser Labels, Inkjet Labels, Thermal Transfer Labels, Thermal Ribbons and Direct Thermal Labels
Visit laserlabel.netWe analyzed Laserlabel.net page load time and found that the first response time was 1.7 sec and then it took 4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
laserlabel.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.0 s
22/100
10%
Value12.2 s
0/100
25%
Value36.3 s
0/100
10%
Value31,940 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.007
100/100
15%
Value65.5 s
0/100
10%
1673 ms
115 ms
128 ms
86 ms
86 ms
Our browser made a total of 83 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Laserlabel.net, 6% (5 requests) were made to Staticw2.yotpo.com and 6% (5 requests) were made to Ddcfq0gxiontw.cloudfront.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) relates to the external source Labelandribbonpros.com.
Page size can be reduced by 868.6 kB (47%)
1.9 MB
983.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Laserlabel.net main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 793.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 97.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 15.4 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 97.4 kB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 22.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Laser Label images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 522.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 522.2 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 227.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Laserlabel.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 227.0 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (50%)
78
39
The browser has sent 78 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Laser Label. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
labelandribbonpros.com
1673 ms
css
115 ms
css
128 ms
jquery-1.7.min.js
86 ms
superfish.js
86 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
90 ms
jquery.mobile.customized.min.js
96 ms
scripts.js
88 ms
jquery.jcarousel.min.js
106 ms
font-awesome.css
107 ms
extra_style.css
106 ms
grid_1170.css
114 ms
styles.css
201 ms
responsive.css
121 ms
superfish.css
115 ms
camera.css
192 ms
widgets.css
114 ms
cloud-zoom.css
194 ms
catalogsale.css
195 ms
prototype.js
225 ms
ccard.js
195 ms
validation.js
196 ms
builder.js
190 ms
effects.js
191 ms
dragdrop.js
207 ms
controls.js
208 ms
slider.js
208 ms
js.js
208 ms
form.js
206 ms
translate.js
208 ms
cookies.js
208 ms
cloud-zoom.1.0.2.min.js
210 ms
bootstrap.js
258 ms
carousel.js
256 ms
camera.js
263 ms
seal.js
68 ms
ga.js
108 ms
widget.js
280 ms
body-bg.gif
48 ms
logo.png
48 ms
banners-1.jpg
64 ms
thermal-transfer-labels.jpg
100 ms
thermal-transfer-ribbons.jpg
98 ms
laser-and-inkjet-labels.jpg
64 ms
direct-thermal-labels.jpg
140 ms
tr4085plus_29.jpg
63 ms
b220_32.jpg
96 ms
806_fl_pink.png
96 ms
318600_318611_318622.jpg
97 ms
gp725_thumb_1_1.jpg
141 ms
fg400200.jpg
141 ms
120600.jpg
143 ms
620234.jpg
137 ms
310555_310735_331233_340749_1_1_2_1.jpg
140 ms
LRP_G_Button.jpg
179 ms
credit-cards.png
141 ms
nav-container.gif
118 ms
marker-8.gif
117 ms
rxxXUYj4oZ6Q5oDJFtEd6i3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
99 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
103 ms
secure90x72.gif
73 ms
__utm.gif
48 ms
print.css
70 ms
WidgetScript
317 ms
toogle-button.png
22 ms
camera-loader.gif
22 ms
slide0.jpg
52 ms
widget.css
207 ms
i
77 ms
batch
327 ms
slide1.jpg
32 ms
css
15 ms
_WidgetJPCB0
773 ms
sign_in_url
52 ms
thumb.jpg
192 ms
i
19 ms
thumb.jpg
117 ms
thumb.jpg
84 ms
thumb.jpg
146 ms
thumb.jpg
97 ms
yotpo-widget-font.svg
40 ms
yotpo-widget-font.woff
39 ms
blank.gif
10 ms
laserlabel.net accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA IDs are not unique
laserlabel.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
laserlabel.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Laserlabel.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Laserlabel.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
laserlabel.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Laser Label. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: