2 sec in total
242 ms
1.5 sec
230 ms
Click here to check amazing Laser Light content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about laserlight.org
We accept most major PPO medical plans, Medicare, Partnership Health Plan and Medi-Cal, along with Covered California/Obamacare plans.
Visit laserlight.orgWe analyzed Laserlight.org page load time and found that the first response time was 242 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
laserlight.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.7 s
59/100
10%
Value15.0 s
0/100
25%
Value7.6 s
26/100
10%
Value210 ms
88/100
30%
Value1.293
1/100
15%
Value7.4 s
49/100
10%
242 ms
58 ms
119 ms
107 ms
108 ms
Our browser made a total of 42 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (39 requests) were addressed to the original Laserlight.org, 5% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Laserlight.org.
Page size can be reduced by 188.0 kB (6%)
3.2 MB
3.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Laserlight.org main page is 3.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 39.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 39.2 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 132.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Laser Light images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 5.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 11.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Laserlight.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 11.4 kB or 14% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (63%)
40
15
The browser has sent 40 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Laser Light. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
laserlight.org
242 ms
style.min.css
58 ms
style.css
119 ms
gutenberg.min.css
107 ms
karma-political-blue.css
108 ms
_font-awesome.css
110 ms
_mobile.css
112 ms
style.css
113 ms
smartslider.min.css
161 ms
jquery.min.js
170 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
165 ms
n2.min.js
165 ms
smartslider-frontend.min.js
167 ms
ss-simple.min.js
193 ms
w-arrow-image.min.js
244 ms
custom-main.js
244 ms
superfish.js
248 ms
retina.js
249 ms
jquery.flexslider.js
250 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
251 ms
jquery.isotope.js
265 ms
core.min.js
269 ms
tabs.min.js
265 ms
accordion.min.js
271 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
275 ms
scrollWatch.js
275 ms
analytics.js
22 ms
overlay-rays.png
159 ms
new-header-090920-1.jpg
183 ms
home-slider-cycles-2000-500.jpg
492 ms
home-slider-golf-2000-500.jpg
1063 ms
slider-legs-2000-500.jpg
451 ms
home-slider-woman-2000-500.jpg
399 ms
global-sprite.png
182 ms
loader-trans.gif
235 ms
veins-030716-2-middle-275-275x145.jpg
236 ms
skin-technology-home-middle-2-275x145.jpg
339 ms
joelcrop-middle-275-150-275x145.jpg
340 ms
laserlight.org
493 ms
collect
22 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
548 ms
js
52 ms
laserlight.org accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
laserlight.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
laserlight.org SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Laserlight.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Laserlight.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
laserlight.org
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Laser Light. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: