2.7 sec in total
260 ms
2.1 sec
326 ms
Visit lassiterexcavating.com now to see the best up-to-date Lassiter Excavating content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about lassiterexcavating.com
Since 1989, we offer residential and commercial excavating, swimming pool demolition and removal. We also do grading, pier drilling for room additions and decks.
Visit lassiterexcavating.comWe analyzed Lassiterexcavating.com page load time and found that the first response time was 260 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
lassiterexcavating.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.0 s
85/100
10%
Value7.7 s
3/100
25%
Value5.7 s
52/100
10%
Value470 ms
60/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value6.9 s
53/100
10%
260 ms
19 ms
28 ms
84 ms
82 ms
Our browser made a total of 65 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (56 requests) were addressed to the original Lassiterexcavating.com, 5% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Lassiterexcavating.com.
Page size can be reduced by 877.2 kB (37%)
2.4 MB
1.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Lassiterexcavating.com main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 28.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.7 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 28.7 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 37.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lassiter Excavating images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 440.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 440.3 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 370.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lassiterexcavating.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 370.6 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (63%)
62
23
The browser has sent 62 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lassiter Excavating. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
lassiterexcavating.com
260 ms
css
19 ms
css
28 ms
bootstrap.css
84 ms
magnific-popup.css
82 ms
jquery.bxslider.css
116 ms
owl.carousel.css
149 ms
owl.theme.css
179 ms
flexslider.css
212 ms
font-awesome.css
244 ms
animate.css
281 ms
lightbox.css
311 ms
settings.css
345 ms
style.css
415 ms
red.css
412 ms
jquery.min.js
492 ms
jquery.migrate.js
491 ms
lightbox-plus-jquery.min.js
547 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
540 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
572 ms
jquery.bxslider.min.js
605 ms
jquery.flexslider.js
638 ms
jquery.appear.js
671 ms
jquery.countTo.js
705 ms
bootstrap.js
739 ms
jquery.imagesloaded.min.js
771 ms
retina-1.1.0.min.js
802 ms
plugins-scroll.js
835 ms
waypoint.min.js
869 ms
icheck.js
903 ms
tabAnchor.js
934 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
968 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
1039 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
1037 ms
jquery.mb.YTPlayer.js
1069 ms
YTPlayer.css
1102 ms
script.js
1142 ms
LassiterLogo_275x152.png
1265 ms
css
15 ms
loader.js
58 ms
pattern2.png
835 ms
close.png
836 ms
loading.gif
856 ms
prev.png
868 ms
next.png
900 ms
beforeafterpoolremovalslide-1.jpg
1014 ms
excavatingslide-2.jpg
1055 ms
drillingslide-3.jpg
1112 ms
timer.png
1053 ms
review-us-4.png
1067 ms
yelp-2c-outline.png
1101 ms
bbb_a_rating.png
1133 ms
fbook.png
1174 ms
gplus.png
1148 ms
BfQP1MR3mJNaumtWa4Tizg.ttf
8 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1218 ms
impl-1_23.js
5 ms
twitter.png
1176 ms
dc.js
120 ms
bx_loader.gif
469 ms
loader.gif
504 ms
large_left.png
536 ms
large_right.png
570 ms
__utm.gif
11 ms
wcm
35 ms
lassiterexcavating.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
lassiterexcavating.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
lassiterexcavating.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lassiterexcavating.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lassiterexcavating.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lassiterexcavating.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lassiter Excavating. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: