3.7 sec in total
632 ms
2.8 sec
231 ms
Click here to check amazing Last Review content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about last-review.net
The best in the world of video games, consoles, movies, series and technological devices. Follow us and keep up to date.
Visit last-review.netWe analyzed Last-review.net page load time and found that the first response time was 632 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
last-review.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.5 s
35/100
10%
Value7.4 s
4/100
25%
Value5.4 s
56/100
10%
Value200 ms
89/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value8.2 s
40/100
10%
632 ms
85 ms
215 ms
229 ms
152 ms
Our browser made a total of 41 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 76% of them (31 requests) were addressed to the original Last-review.net, 10% (4 requests) were made to Lastreview.motobloggers.com and 7% (3 requests) were made to S.gravatar.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Last-review.net.
Page size can be reduced by 246.1 kB (29%)
842.7 kB
596.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Last-review.net main page is 842.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 511.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 28.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 28.3 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 7.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Last Review images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 97.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 97.5 kB or 61% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 112.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Last-review.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 112.7 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (50%)
38
19
The browser has sent 38 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Last Review. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
last-review.net
632 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
85 ms
style.css
215 ms
style.css
229 ms
wordpresscom-stats-smiley-remover.css
152 ms
style.css
157 ms
style-frontpage.css
151 ms
jetpack.css
162 ms
jquery.js
255 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
171 ms
fppg.js
228 ms
frontend.js
301 ms
nivo-slider.js
303 ms
style-mobile.css
231 ms
uk-cookie-consent-js.js
1255 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
4 ms
gprofiles.js
58 ms
wpgroho.js
236 ms
e-201611.js
6 ms
fontfaces.css
102 ms
back.png
305 ms
YouTube.png
313 ms
Twitter.png
316 ms
RSS.png
319 ms
cropped-banner-def10502.png
499 ms
slider-2-pc_10502.jpg
558 ms
slider-3-pc_10501.jpg
1585 ms
slider-1-pc_10501.jpg
1665 ms
slider-5-pc_1050.jpg
1887 ms
slider-6-pc_1050.jpg
1891 ms
image1_308205.jpg
1032 ms
image-lavagna308.jpg
863 ms
image3_homeoffice308.jpg
1123 ms
image-pc-lastreview-300x244.jpg
1051 ms
loading.gif
1145 ms
border.png
1215 ms
OpenSans-Regular-webfont.woff
1251 ms
BebasNeue-webfont.woff
1432 ms
hovercard.css
29 ms
services.css
56 ms
g.gif
9 ms
last-review.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
last-review.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
last-review.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Last-review.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Last-review.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
last-review.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Last Review. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: