Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 33

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 18% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 64

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    24% of websites

lastinput.com

** LASTINPUT.COM **

Page Load Speed

120 ms in total

First Response

18 ms

Resources Loaded

39 ms

Page Rendered

63 ms

lastinput.com screenshot

About Website

Visit lastinput.com now to see the best up-to-date LASTINPUT content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about lastinput.com

Visit lastinput.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Lastinput.com page load time and found that the first response time was 18 ms and then it took 102 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lastinput.com performance score

0

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value0

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.016

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value0

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

lastinput.com

18 ms

experience-abundance-in-your-life.php

15 ms

Our browser made a total of 2 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 50% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Lastinput.com, 50% (1 request) were made to Bethechangeteam.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (18 ms) belongs to the original domain Lastinput.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 142.5 kB (60%)

Content Size

236.7 kB

After Optimization

94.2 kB

In fact, the total size of Lastinput.com main page is 236.7 kB. This result falls within the top 5000 of lightweight and thus fast loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 236.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-33%

Potential reduce by 132 B

  • Original 401 B
  • After minification 378 B
  • After compression 269 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 132 B or 33% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-60%

Potential reduce by 142.3 kB

  • Original 236.3 kB
  • After minification 236.3 kB
  • After compression 94.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 142.3 kB or 60% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

1

After Optimization

1

The browser has sent 1 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of LASTINPUT. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

lastinput.com accessibility score

33

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

lastinput.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

lastinput.com SEO score

64

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lastinput.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Lastinput.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of LASTINPUT. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: