1.3 sec in total
61 ms
778 ms
426 ms
Click here to check amazing Lawn Mower Review content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about lawnmowerreview.org
Your one-stop destination for the best lawn mower reviews, buying guides & money saving offers. Trusted by experts we're here to help you make the best lawn care decision.
Visit lawnmowerreview.orgWe analyzed Lawnmowerreview.org page load time and found that the first response time was 61 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.
lawnmowerreview.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.3 s
18/100
10%
Value5.5 s
19/100
25%
Value20.4 s
0/100
10%
Value45,030 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.077
95/100
15%
Value58.5 s
0/100
10%
61 ms
94 ms
38 ms
42 ms
44 ms
Our browser made a total of 56 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (42 requests) were addressed to the original Lawnmowerreview.org, 5% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (449 ms) relates to the external source Aax-us-east.amazon-adsystem.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.3 MB (65%)
2.0 MB
689.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Lawnmowerreview.org main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 188.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 188.5 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 15.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lawn Mower Review images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 254.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 254.8 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 847.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lawnmowerreview.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 847.4 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 40 (78%)
51
11
The browser has sent 51 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lawn Mower Review. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
lawnmowerreview.org
61 ms
lawnmowerreview.org
94 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
38 ms
styles.css
42 ms
eggrehub.css
44 ms
style.css
53 ms
responsive.css
45 ms
css.css
91 ms
font-awesome.min.css
49 ms
css
94 ms
css
100 ms
js_composer.min.css
74 ms
jquery.js
87 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
88 ms
price_alert.js
87 ms
external-tracking.min.js
90 ms
onejs
127 ms
dashicons.min.css
90 ms
thickbox.css
87 ms
animate.min.css
87 ms
typicons.min.css
87 ms
font-awesome.min.css
83 ms
tooltipster.bundle.min.css
87 ms
tooltipster-borderless.min.css
87 ms
featherlight.min.css
88 ms
style-new.min.css
88 ms
pagecount.min.js
90 ms
scripts.js
87 ms
custom.js
88 ms
jquery.sticky.js
87 ms
comment-reply.min.js
88 ms
commentplus_re.js
87 ms
wp-embed.min.js
88 ms
thickbox.js
88 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
89 ms
waypoints.min.js
88 ms
tooltipster.bundle.min.js
88 ms
featherlight.min.js
88 ms
jstz.min.js
89 ms
script.min.js
88 ms
analytics.js
256 ms
lawn-mower-review-logo-lg.png
101 ms
Grass.jpg
186 ms
noimage_250_180.png
181 ms
getad
449 ms
sdk.js
237 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
235 ms
25b6.svg
190 ms
loadingAnimation.gif
61 ms
typicons.woff
222 ms
linkid.js
18 ms
collect
50 ms
collect
84 ms
86 ms
ga-audiences
85 ms
0sTQzbapM8j.js
69 ms
lawnmowerreview.org accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
lawnmowerreview.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
lawnmowerreview.org SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lawnmowerreview.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lawnmowerreview.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lawnmowerreview.org
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Lawn Mower Review. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: