3.5 sec in total
38 ms
2.2 sec
1.2 sec
Click here to check amazing LBM Journal content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about lbmjournal.com
Industry trends, data, products and best practices for lumberyards, building material distributors, wholesalers manufacturers, and service providers.
Visit lbmjournal.comWe analyzed Lbmjournal.com page load time and found that the first response time was 38 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
lbmjournal.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
53/100
10%
Value4.2 s
45/100
25%
Value4.1 s
80/100
10%
Value10 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value5.0 s
76/100
10%
38 ms
91 ms
44 ms
60 ms
74 ms
Our browser made a total of 79 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 57% of them (45 requests) were addressed to the original Lbmjournal.com, 22% (17 requests) were made to Assets-lbmjournal-com.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com and 13% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (488 ms) relates to the external source Lbmjournal.advertserve.com.
Page size can be reduced by 213.5 kB (49%)
437.1 kB
223.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Lbmjournal.com main page is 437.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. HTML takes 254.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 212.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 212.0 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. LBM Journal images are well optimized though.
Number of requests can be reduced by 43 (65%)
66
23
The browser has sent 66 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of LBM Journal. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
lbmjournal.com
38 ms
lbmjournal.com
91 ms
style.min.css
44 ms
valet-public.css
60 ms
font-awesome.css
74 ms
frontend.css
115 ms
frontend.min.css
106 ms
flatpickr.min.css
78 ms
select2.min.css
80 ms
yop-poll-public-6.4.7.css
81 ms
style.css
128 ms
css
55 ms
style.css
132 ms
style.css
131 ms
td_legacy_main.css
144 ms
td_standard_pack_main.css
163 ms
jquery.min.js
157 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
157 ms
valet-public.js
159 ms
flatpickr.min.js
158 ms
select2.min.js
251 ms
yop-poll-public-6.4.7.min.js
252 ms
css
59 ms
core.min.js
238 ms
mouse.min.js
254 ms
draggable.min.js
253 ms
menu.min.js
254 ms
selectmenu.min.js
259 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
258 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
256 ms
dom-ready.min.js
262 ms
hooks.min.js
267 ms
i18n.min.js
264 ms
a11y.min.js
267 ms
autocomplete.min.js
268 ms
slider.min.js
268 ms
datepicker.min.js
269 ms
jquery.ui.touch-punch.js
270 ms
js_functions.js
274 ms
frontend.min.js
270 ms
underscore.min.js
251 ms
js_posts_autoload.min.js
240 ms
tagdiv_theme.min.js
226 ms
js_files_for_front.min.js
221 ms
cp-popup.min.js
189 ms
logo-sm.png
164 ms
TC471372077-500x462.jpg
285 ms
footer-logo.png
305 ms
footer-logo.png
212 ms
ABC-supply-trucks-218x150.jpg
213 ms
RI09221320743296DRK-265x198.jpg
331 ms
07Weyerhaeuser-265x198.jpg
312 ms
PaulBardenShadow-265x198.jpg
304 ms
Sept-Tough-Call-265x198.jpg
301 ms
zhpe_buyers_Infographic-218x150.jpg
275 ms
Cesar-Gonzalez-84-Lumber-Lumber-Ft-Launderdale-218x150.jpg
300 ms
Mortgage-rates-increase-istockanilakkus-218x150.jpg
328 ms
LBM-Product-Showcase-Paradigm-Estimate-Takeoff-Service-Jan-28-web-graphic_1280x360-218x150.jpg
365 ms
Pearland--218x150.jpg
329 ms
MostureShield-Texas-218x150.jpg
325 ms
LBMJournal-BoostYourCompanySales-emailheader-100x70.jpg
344 ms
Image-for-wp-100x70.jpg
384 ms
Epicor-Labor-Shortage-Main-image_220-100x70.jpg
364 ms
05Armadillo-100x70.jpg
365 ms
LBM-Product-Showcase-Paradigm-Estimate-Takeoff-Service-Jan-28-web-graphic_1280x360-100x70.jpg
350 ms
ScreenRail-WHT-0051-6-LBM-Ad-1280x720-1-100x70.jpg
358 ms
zone
488 ms
ieVl2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-19K7CA.ttf
381 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
381 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf
386 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf
384 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
384 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
386 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf
380 ms
newspaper.woff
353 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf
360 ms
S6u8w4BMUTPHjxsAXC-v.ttf
8 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf
9 ms
cp-popup.min.css
84 ms
lbmjournal.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
lbmjournal.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
lbmjournal.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lbmjournal.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lbmjournal.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lbmjournal.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of LBM Journal. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: