Tools & Wizards About Us
leadpaging.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

leadpaging.com

Safelist Rankings from Leadpaging - the best free safelists, credit safelists, and more! The best safelists!

Page Load Speed

4 sec in total

First Response

214 ms

Resources Loaded

3.7 sec

Page Rendered

142 ms

leadpaging.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to leadpaging.com homepage info - get ready to check Leadpaging best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about leadpaging.com

Safelist rankings system. The original safelist ratings page! Find the best safelists online!

Visit leadpaging.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Leadpaging.com page load time and found that the first response time was 214 ms and then it took 3.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

leadpaging.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

leadpaging.com

214 ms

safelist-rankings.gif

313 ms

worldwide_safelist.gif

216 ms

leading-safelists-leftpoll.jpg

313 ms

leading-safelists-rightpoll.jpg

312 ms

Our browser made a total of 10 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 50% of them (5 requests) were addressed to the original Leadpaging.com, 20% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 10% (1 request) were made to Globalsafelist.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.8 sec) relates to the external source Europeansafelist.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 9.5 kB (49%)

Content Size

19.1 kB

After Optimization

9.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Leadpaging.com main page is 19.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 10.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 7.9 kB

  • Original 10.6 kB
  • After minification 9.8 kB
  • After compression 2.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 7.9 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-36%

Potential reduce by 597 B

  • Original 1.7 kB
  • After minification 1.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Leadpaging needs image optimization as it can save up to 597 B or 36% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 971 B

  • Original 6.8 kB
  • After minification 6.8 kB
  • After compression 5.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 971 B or 14% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

9

After Optimization

9

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 9 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Leadpaging. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

leadpaging.com

leadpaging.com

214 ms

safelist-rankings.gif

safelist-rankings.gif

313 ms

worldwide_safelist.gif

worldwide_safelist.gif

216 ms

leading-safelists-leftpoll.jpg

leading-safelists-leftpoll.jpg

313 ms

leading-safelists-rightpoll.jpg

leading-safelists-rightpoll.jpg

312 ms

runner.php

runner.php

487 ms

urchin.js

urchin.js

21 ms

high-targeted-traffic.gif

high-targeted-traffic.gif

362 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

11 ms

468x60.gif

468x60.gif

2837 ms

SEO Factors

leadpaging.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Leadpaging.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Leadpaging.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

leadpaging.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Leadpaging. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: