8 sec in total
610 ms
6.9 sec
532 ms
Click here to check amazing Ledit content for Russia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ledit.ru
Большой каталог светодиодного оборудования, услуги по монтажу LED оборудования, консультации специалистов, доставка по всей России - «Центр светодиодного освещения».
Visit ledit.ruWe analyzed Ledit.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 610 ms and then it took 7.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
ledit.ru performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.7 s
59/100
10%
Value6.7 s
7/100
25%
Value7.4 s
27/100
10%
Value1,020 ms
26/100
30%
Value0.058
98/100
15%
Value12.3 s
15/100
10%
610 ms
1535 ms
276 ms
576 ms
712 ms
Our browser made a total of 68 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 74% of them (50 requests) were addressed to the original Ledit.ru, 10% (7 requests) were made to Api-maps.yandex.ru and 3% (2 requests) were made to Bitrix.info. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Ledit.ru.
Page size can be reduced by 592.4 kB (37%)
1.6 MB
992.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Ledit.ru main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 873.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 187.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 29.5 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 187.7 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 67.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ledit images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 179.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 179.4 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 157.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ledit.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 157.9 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (12%)
58
51
The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ledit. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
ledit.ru
610 ms
www.ledit.ru
1535 ms
kernel_main.css
276 ms
template_947c440ac13437bd75b09c26f016f0c2.css
576 ms
kernel_main.js
712 ms
template_ffaa5761015d2f57736c77b06041e677.js
2198 ms
282 ms
726 ms
ba.js
1690 ms
combine.xml
918 ms
logo.png
204 ms
cart.png
613 ms
calc.png
227 ms
mark.png
204 ms
helmet.png
201 ms
medal.png
345 ms
aeebd03b1b77b354cdcea708ca8aadcc.png
470 ms
ed5d22d3405d23fecde8f8c05ce13efa.png
348 ms
93ce4f5c3ad3260cfd116544a8f310be.png
614 ms
c61c5350995e98df715c27223a455af2.png
751 ms
e10d6cf63bcd4ab5a1529fd7b4c4963d.png
752 ms
eec1325751e6c292c4e6a120d0d36946.png
1273 ms
28d76616127261129a205393dffa5be9.png
1644 ms
ca75078160b52746c3c074ad853df3ec.png
758 ms
21ed8aaa4d3453614b1d2e66e173f0f6.png
1126 ms
bfd5df199dd0bafcc62e5d4fcebf3d9e.png
1125 ms
688670125dd121fe708a362c6b3ced9d.png
1127 ms
29acd2daa06676f6bdee33c65b8e56c9.jpg
1270 ms
02a92806ae7788d8eadbcb8b45806294.jpg
1267 ms
478b82ea8e9e3fe20409981074c96cf1.jpg
2060 ms
18a50a2a64ce483d1adca8c848a4a031.jpg
1513 ms
e2f9401466f7ffb44f91c438071ae351.jpg
1576 ms
ec7841b7970258c09708fb4522da8f19.jpg
1402 ms
ac97de5ed1ce48f16072d3ccb39c4ac3.jpg
2562 ms
9d8ccfed3b1cbdffd35a9fd131fea83d.jpg
1719 ms
34f683d92169dc9ce5fed1d8a476de84.png
1665 ms
91f3575e3334d2957b2c084f0527436c.jpg
1722 ms
dbac6fc5ac1078449508c82ede097f40.png
1772 ms
40865c2252a07b86e53d58a2b2b1157f.png
1924 ms
c713bded98cd93751ea9d3d4f3d0ece5.gif
1844 ms
3ea7448ad719cf3d7599e1f585dda624.jpg
1849 ms
68f84c84af9dec88914b576e7fe23043.png
2083 ms
179c41b9124bfcfa7e24b6a22a779170.png
2038 ms
9f0523b965e4c27201c340d01cc7a4bb.gif
2035 ms
7583001c268b504be405a2579ee2f73d.jpg
2254 ms
watch.js
2 ms
analytics.js
189 ms
4af266a9bfca92c8cc3b03ee3c1213f3.png
2192 ms
fql
230 ms
count.json
35 ms
share.php
308 ms
gpp.xml
417 ms
8b538651d37cc27fe48e98566df8daf7.png
2003 ms
steps.png
2482 ms
collect
34 ms
arrow-search-small.png
2019 ms
search.png
2122 ms
collect
89 ms
promo-bg.jpg
2004 ms
bx_loader.gif
2025 ms
prev.png
1932 ms
dk
792 ms
next.png
1898 ms
ef50ac9e93aaebe3299791c79f277f8e.cur
180 ms
3ce22e999d54bb9ca8150a59207f9d3e.cur
222 ms
4965b66fe115b2f2ed500ece66514d86.cur
375 ms
77492cf358d8b12629399322926c93f2.cur
507 ms
bx_stat
247 ms
ledit.ru accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
ledit.ru best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
ledit.ru SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
RU
RU
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ledit.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ledit.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ledit.ru
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ledit. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: