Tools & Wizards About Us
leister.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 26

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    45% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 71% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

leister.in

Leister - Plastic Welding and Process Heat

Page Load Speed

6.6 sec in total

First Response

189 ms

Resources Loaded

2.1 sec

Page Rendered

4.3 sec

leister.in screenshot

About Website

Visit leister.in now to see the best up-to-date Leister content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about leister.in

Leister operates as a global market and innovation leader in plastic welding, process heat, and laser plastic welding. Leister serves countless industries with automatic welding machines, heat guns, w...

Visit leister.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Leister.in page load time and found that the first response time was 189 ms and then it took 6.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

leister.in performance score

26

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

26/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.0 s

14/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,230 ms

20/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.015

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.0 s

10/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

leister.in

189 ms

en

716 ms

gtm.js

57 ms

uc.js

24 ms

newIcons.css

133 ms

Our browser made a total of 27 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Leister.in, 56% (15 requests) were made to Leister.com and 33% (9 requests) were made to Cdn-assets.leister.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (787 ms) relates to the external source Leister.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 505.2 kB (6%)

Content Size

8.1 MB

After Optimization

7.6 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Leister.in main page is 8.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 7.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 417.4 kB

  • Original 470.3 kB
  • After minification 470.2 kB
  • After compression 52.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 417.4 kB or 89% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 7.6 MB
  • After minification 7.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Leister images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 87.9 kB

  • Original 113.2 kB
  • After minification 113.2 kB
  • After compression 25.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 87.9 kB or 78% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (16%)

Requests Now

19

After Optimization

16

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 19 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Leister. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

leister.in

leister.in

189 ms

en

en

716 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

57 ms

uc.js

uc.js

24 ms

newIcons.css

newIcons.css

133 ms

3.ac2039a6.chunk.css

3.ac2039a6.chunk.css

233 ms

main.0c9ceba4.chunk.css

main.0c9ceba4.chunk.css

341 ms

57314.jpg

57314.jpg

427 ms

57342.jpg

57342.jpg

435 ms

57344.jpg

57344.jpg

442 ms

57305.jpg

57305.jpg

450 ms

177502.jpg

177502.jpg

765 ms

57312.jpg

57312.jpg

493 ms

57348.jpg

57348.jpg

662 ms

49704.png

49704.png

443 ms

48467.jpg

48467.jpg

461 ms

newIcons.svg

newIcons.svg

420 ms

leister-logo.svg

leister-logo.svg

430 ms

3.46cfef8b.chunk.js

3.46cfef8b.chunk.js

787 ms

main.b968cf90.chunk.js

main.b968cf90.chunk.js

591 ms

chevron-down.b5e7dd60.svg

chevron-down.b5e7dd60.svg

94 ms

AvenirNextWorldDemi_normal_normal_subset1.7352fb46.woff

AvenirNextWorldDemi_normal_normal_subset1.7352fb46.woff

107 ms

AvenirNextWorldDemi_normal_normal_subset1.51aa1936.woff

AvenirNextWorldDemi_normal_normal_subset1.51aa1936.woff

193 ms

AvenirNextWorldBold_normal_normal_subset1.457244d2.woff

AvenirNextWorldBold_normal_normal_subset1.457244d2.woff

121 ms

AvenirNextWorldBold_normal_normal_subset1.7485ce64.woff

AvenirNextWorldBold_normal_normal_subset1.7485ce64.woff

143 ms

AvenirNextWorldRegular_normal_normal_subset1.7c42c587.woff

AvenirNextWorldRegular_normal_normal_subset1.7c42c587.woff

205 ms

AvenirNextWorldRegular_normal_normal_subset1.df7497b6.woff

AvenirNextWorldRegular_normal_normal_subset1.df7497b6.woff

218 ms

Accessibility Review

leister.in accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

leister.in best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

leister.in SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Leister.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Leister.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

leister.in

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Leister. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: