Tools & Wizards About Us
lettercount.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 45

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    64% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 66% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

lettercount.com

Letter Count Tool | Accurate Character Counter for X Twitter Effective Communication

Page Load Speed

1.2 sec in total

First Response

64 ms

Resources Loaded

803 ms

Page Rendered

356 ms

lettercount.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to lettercount.com homepage info - get ready to check Letter Count best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about lettercount.com

Use our Letter Count Tool to accurately count characters for X Twitter, other social media, SEO, business letters, and more. Ensure your text meets the specific character limits for effective communic...

Visit lettercount.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Lettercount.com page load time and found that the first response time was 64 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lettercount.com performance score

45

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

72/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

89/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.5 s

72/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,530 ms

13/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.471

18/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.1 s

20/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

lettercount.com

64 ms

www.lettercount.com

112 ms

reset.css

19 ms

featherlight.min.css

36 ms

styles.css

49 ms

Our browser made a total of 67 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 96% of them (64 requests) were addressed to the original Lettercount.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Scrsrc.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (388 ms) relates to the external source Pagead2.googlesyndication.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 36.9 kB (11%)

Content Size

325.6 kB

After Optimization

288.7 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Lettercount.com main page is 325.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 274.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 35.4 kB

  • Original 46.9 kB
  • After minification 43.7 kB
  • After compression 11.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 35.4 kB or 75% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 574 B

  • Original 274.3 kB
  • After minification 274.3 kB
  • After compression 273.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-21%

Potential reduce by 913 B

  • Original 4.4 kB
  • After minification 4.4 kB
  • After compression 3.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lettercount.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 913 B or 21% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (32%)

Requests Now

65

After Optimization

44

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 65 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Letter Count. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

lettercount.com

lettercount.com

64 ms

www.lettercount.com

www.lettercount.com

112 ms

reset.css

reset.css

19 ms

featherlight.min.css

featherlight.min.css

36 ms

styles.css

styles.css

49 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

134 ms

391842129.php

391842129.php

218 ms

jquery-1.11.2.min.js

jquery-1.11.2.min.js

95 ms

featherlight.min.js

featherlight.min.js

94 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

93 ms

cookiebar_fct.js

cookiebar_fct.js

93 ms

facebook.webp

facebook.webp

44 ms

twitter.webp

twitter.webp

42 ms

english_us.webp

english_us.webp

42 ms

english_uk.webp

english_uk.webp

42 ms

french.webp

french.webp

42 ms

spanish.webp

spanish.webp

42 ms

portuguese.webp

portuguese.webp

119 ms

italian.webp

italian.webp

117 ms

german.webp

german.webp

119 ms

dutch.webp

dutch.webp

115 ms

polish.webp

polish.webp

117 ms

russian.webp

russian.webp

118 ms

greek.webp

greek.webp

119 ms

arabic.webp

arabic.webp

119 ms

chinese.webp

chinese.webp

120 ms

reset-btn.webp

reset-btn.webp

120 ms

soft_word97_th.webp

soft_word97_th.webp

121 ms

soft_word2010_th.webp

soft_word2010_th.webp

121 ms

soft_openoffice_th.webp

soft_openoffice_th.webp

121 ms

soft_libreoffice_th.webp

soft_libreoffice_th.webp

122 ms

soft_abi_th.webp

soft_abi_th.webp

122 ms

soft_wordperfect_th.webp

soft_wordperfect_th.webp

123 ms

soft_googledocs_th.webp

soft_googledocs_th.webp

123 ms

loveletter.webp

loveletter.webp

124 ms

long.webp

long.webp

124 ms

counter.webp

counter.webp

124 ms

languages.webp

languages.webp

124 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

388 ms

twitter.gif

twitter.gif

28 ms

spanish.gif

spanish.gif

27 ms

english_us.gif

english_us.gif

28 ms

english_uk.gif

english_uk.gif

28 ms

french.gif

french.gif

28 ms

facebook.gif

facebook.gif

29 ms

dutch.gif

dutch.gif

18 ms

italian.gif

italian.gif

19 ms

polish.gif

polish.gif

18 ms

russian.gif

russian.gif

20 ms

portuguese.gif

portuguese.gif

18 ms

german.gif

german.gif

19 ms

greek.gif

greek.gif

33 ms

arabic.gif

arabic.gif

34 ms

chinese.gif

chinese.gif

36 ms

reset-btn.gif

reset-btn.gif

35 ms

soft_word97_th.gif

soft_word97_th.gif

36 ms

soft_word2010_th.gif

soft_word2010_th.gif

38 ms

soft_openoffice_th.gif

soft_openoffice_th.gif

50 ms

soft_libreoffice_th.gif

soft_libreoffice_th.gif

50 ms

soft_abi_th.gif

soft_abi_th.gif

54 ms

soft_wordperfect_th.gif

soft_wordperfect_th.gif

56 ms

soft_googledocs_th.gif

soft_googledocs_th.gif

56 ms

loveletter.gif

loveletter.gif

76 ms

long.gif

long.gif

81 ms

counter.gif

counter.gif

67 ms

languages.gif

languages.gif

69 ms

funny_sun.webp

funny_sun.webp

62 ms

Accessibility Review

lettercount.com accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Best Practices

lettercount.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

lettercount.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lettercount.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lettercount.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

lettercount.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Letter Count. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: