Report Summary

  • 62

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    77% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 62% of websites

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    71% of websites

level.systems

Level Systems - Electronic Monitoring and GPS Tracking of Assets

Page Load Speed

3.4 sec in total

First Response

304 ms

Resources Loaded

2.7 sec

Page Rendered

352 ms

level.systems screenshot

About Website

Welcome to level.systems homepage info - get ready to check Level best content right away, or after learning these important things about level.systems

LEVEL Systems is one of the leaders in GPS tracking and monitoring of all types of assets such as vehicles, railway cars, cargo, machines, houses etc.

Visit level.systems

Key Findings

We analyzed Level.systems page load time and found that the first response time was 304 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

level.systems performance score

62

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

53/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.9 s

6/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.2 s

78/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value170 ms

93/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.9 s

44/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

level.systems

304 ms

level.systems

390 ms

www.level.systems

868 ms

app.js

120 ms

n2.min.js

312 ms

Our browser made a total of 37 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Level.systems and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (972 ms) belongs to the original domain Level.systems.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 559.0 kB (31%)

Content Size

1.8 MB

After Optimization

1.2 MB

In fact, the total size of Level.systems main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 491.1 kB

  • Original 585.4 kB
  • After minification 581.9 kB
  • After compression 94.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 491.1 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 67.9 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Level images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 6 (24%)

Requests Now

25

After Optimization

19

The browser has sent 25 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Level. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

level.systems accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

SEO Factors

level.systems SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Level.systems can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Level.systems main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Level. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: